Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Protecting Agencies From Oversight, Obama Threatens to Veto Intelligence Funding

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:13 AM
Original message
Protecting Agencies From Oversight, Obama Threatens to Veto Intelligence Funding
Source: The Raw Story

The White House is threatening to veto a key intelligence funding bill over what it considers to be a dangerous amount of oversight on covert agencies, according to published reports.

The 2010 Intelligence Budget has gone through a number of key changes over the past few months, with House Democrats and the Obama administration butting heads over a number of provisions. Key among them for the latest White House veto threat is a provision that would allow the Government Accountability Office to investigate intelligence agencies.

"Current law exempts intelligence and counterintelligence activities from GAO review, leaving oversight to the inspectors general at the various intelligence community agencies," Politico reported.

In a letter to the House and Senate intelligence committees, Office of Management and Budget chief Peter Orszag highlighted several areas of the bill that have intelligence officials worried, including the GAO oversight provision.

Orszag's letter also claims that proposed reforms to how Congress is notified of covert activities poses a "serious" threat that intelligence agencies object to.

more: http://rawstory.com/2010/03/protecting-agencies-oversight-obama-threatens-veto-intelligence-funding/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. oversight from the agencies themselves - guess we are just following the wall street precedent
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 09:21 AM by DrDan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Makes sense, presidents have the authority to torture or assassinate anyone the presidents declares
is an enemy in the never-ending war on terror.

That is what our Constitution says, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let's tell secrets to McConnell and Boehner. Yuh... Let's do that.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34447.html
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4307944&mesg_id=4307944
"Current law requires the president to notify the Gang of 8 — the top eight lawmakers on the two congressional intelligence committees — when the most dramatic actions are taken. The new funding bill would require the president to notify the eight when an administration makes any changes to covert action policy, and it would require intelligence officials to notify every intelligence committee member of the "main features" of all intelligence activities."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Wow.Just wow.
Don't hurt yourself stretching to defend this shit. So what about the rethugs. They are members of Congress. I argued that COngress should have oversight when bush was in the WH. Nothing has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC