Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Janet Napolitano halts Mexico fence plan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:16 AM
Original message
Janet Napolitano halts Mexico fence plan
Yay! imo this was one really dumb idea from the get-go.


Janet Napolitano halts Mexico fence plan


Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has put the brakes on SBInet, the $3 billion plan to build a virtual fence along the U.S. border with Mexico.

“Not only do we have an obligation to secure our borders, we have a responsibility to do so in the most cost-effective way possible,” Napolitano said in a statement Tuesday. “The system of sensors and cameras along the Southwest border known as SBInet has been plagued with cost overruns and missed deadlines.”

With that in mind, Napolitano is withholding funding for the program’s first deployment until a review she ordered in January is finished. And she’s taking away $50 million in stimulus funds from the Boeing-managed program. Instead, that funding will be put toward “other tested, commercially available security technology along the Southwest border.”

The project’s halt comes amid rising violence along the U.S. border with Mexico that has Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) urging Americans to heed the recent State Department travel warning to delay visits to the Mexican states of Durango, Coahuila and Chihuahua.

The move also comes about a week after the DHS inspector general found more problems with the project.

more...

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/34528.html#ixzz0iR3S0Eb9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would have been more effective to fence IN all of the rich Americans...
.... who are BUYING the coke to begin with.

Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think they like to be fenced in. They don't want our coodies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Uh...It's "cooties"
not "coodies", and I'm sorry if you have them...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good. No more money to ineffective govt. contractors. They need to do the job right
or we need to move on to someone else. My state is notorious as one of the homes of big defense contractors. Pratt and Whitney, Sikorsky Aircraft, Northrop Grumman, the sub bases in Groton. My Mother in law, her husband and the husband of my sister in law all work at Pratt & Whitney. It brings big money into the state but at what cost to the govt. and taxpayers as a whole? I want my family to keep their jobs but at the same time, it does get ridiculous and out of control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. GOOD!!! Another boondoggle...
Edited on Wed Mar-17-10 02:37 PM by GoCubsGo
Another waste of money, just like the "missile defense" program. Glad to see it go. Maybe they can use some of the savings to help resolve the issues that cause people to want to sneak over our boarders in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC