Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Is Nancy Pelosi the most powerful woman in American History?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:51 AM
Original message
"Is Nancy Pelosi the most powerful woman in American History?"
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 08:22 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
This seems to be the TV question de jour but it is really even a question?

Let's see... she has the highest rank/status any woman has ever achieved in our government and wields the most formal power any woman has ever wielded here, so even if she was a weak and ineffective speaker (which she certainly is not) she would STILL be the most powerful woman in our history.

In trying to think of a more powerful woman TV talkers are citing Eleanor Roosevelt and Hillary Clinton which are both off base. Citing "woman behind the man" women is almost insulting and though Hillary has put together a fine resume she doesn't have the formal, or even practical POWER of any Speaker of the House. (No knock there. Everyone knows I admire Hillary.)

In a civilized country power and authority go hand in hand. Nancy Pelosi has a LOT of formal authority. She is the second most powerful person in our government!

So the answer to the question is, "Yes. Duh. No shit."


But there is another respectable answer. Incorrect, but at least worth talking about. One woman in American history made almost as big a difference as Pelosi in the exercise of her formal authority/power, but only because circumstances magnified the practical power of her actions...

Sandra Day O'Connor.

If you are the perennial fifth vote on the Supreme Court then you essentially run the entire judicial branch... in effect you make all the decisions. Technically O'Connor had no more power than Ginsberg or Sotomayor but in practice she was the swing vote who determined the outcome of twenty years of SCOTUS decisions... everything from keeping Roe intact to installing a chimpanzee as President.

Ironically, O'Connor's great power came from being a judicial weakling. She often didn't have a clue and seemed to sometimes render decisions based on polling (!) but her lack of a sturdy intellectual footing is exactly what made her unpredictable and thus the super-powerful swing-vote.

(On today's SCOTUS wishy-washy Kennedy has the most practical power because he's the fifth vote. Scalia is second because he seems to completely control Thomas and thus has two votes in effect.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. What about Oprah Winfrey
Her role as King Maker in the Presidential Election was not insignificant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think she is given more credit than she deserves
I think that Obama himself and his team get the most credit for their wonderfully orchestrated campaign. As to endorsements, I think because of when they happened and what they meant, the Caroline and Teddy Kennedy endorsements meant more. (Now, obviously, only Caroline could be included here - but, she was part of the reason her uncle endorsed as well.)

But, Pelosi easily has more power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with you - it is Pelosi or O'Connor
O'Connor made an awful fateful vote in December 2000, but I would give the edge to Pelosi. At any rate, she is clearly, at the moment, the most powerful woman in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yup. And speaker is so much more powerful than Senate majority leader
Anyone with that job has almost total control of the legislative agenda.

In retrospect, it's kind of surprising more wasn't made of it when she got the job, but Dems taking the House was a much bigger news story than any historical perspective stuff at the time.

Certainly a bigger deal in power terms than if a woman had been elected vice-president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Perhaps, if you are going by the amount of blood on her hands.
Or the amount of dry powder she has collected!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. There's no assumption of good outcomes in the word "power"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC