Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A look at Obama's health care overhaul law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:06 AM
Original message
A look at Obama's health care overhaul law

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hJ40t0N7wq4o5GLbWHhub2aY83CQD9EKROK80">A look at Obama's health care overhaul law

By The Associated Press

Some features of the health care overhaul bill President Barack Obama has signed, along with details on a package of changes under consideration by the Senate:

HOW MANY COVERED: 32 million uninsured. Major coverage expansion begins in 2014. When fully phased in, 94 percent of eligible non-elderly Americans will have coverage, compared with 83 percent now.

COST: $938 billion over 10 years for the coverage expansion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

DEFICIT REDUCTION: CBO says the measure will reduce deficits by $143 billion over a decade.

INSURANCE MANDATE: Almost everyone will be required to be insured or else pay a fine, which takes effect in 2014. There is an exemption for low-income people.

INSURANCE MARKET REFORMS: Starting this year, insurers will be forbidden from placing lifetime dollar limits on policies, from denying coverage to children because of pre-existing conditions, and from canceling policies because someone gets sick. Parents will be able to keep children on their coverage up to age 26. A new high-risk pool will offer coverage to uninsured people with medical problems until 2014, when the coverage expansion goes into high gear. Major consumer safeguards will also take effect in 2014. Insurers will be prohibited from denying coverage to people with medical problems or charging them more. Insurers will not be able to charge women more.

MEDICAID: Expands the federal-state Medicaid insurance program for the poor to cover people with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, $29,327 a year for a family of four. Childless adults will be covered for the first time, starting in 2014. The federal government will pay 100 percent of costs for covering newly eligible individuals through 2016.

If the Senate approves a package of changes this week, a special deal that would have given Nebraska 100 percent federal financing for newly eligible Medicaid recipients in perpetuity would be eliminated. A different, one-time deal negotiated by Democratic Sen. Mary Landrieu for her state, Louisiana, worth as much as $300 million, would remain.

TAXES: The bill applies an increased Medicare payroll tax to investment income and wages of individuals making more than $200,000 a year, or married couples above $250,000. The tax on investment income would be 3.8 percent if the Senate acts on a package of changes this week — higher than originally proposed. If the Senate follows through, the legislation also would impose a 40 percent tax on high-cost insurance plans worth more than $10,200 for individuals and $27,500 for families. The tax would go into effect in 2018.

PRESCRIPTION DRUGS: Gradually closes the "doughnut hole" coverage gap in the Medicare prescription drug benefit that seniors fall into once they have spent $2,830. Seniors who hit the gap this year would receive a $250 rebate, if the Senate acts this week. Beginning in 2011, seniors in the gap would receive a discount on brand name drugs, initially 50 percent off. When the gap is completely eliminated in 2020, seniors will still be responsible for 25 percent of the cost of their medications until Medicare's catastrophic coverage kicks in.

EMPLOYER RESPONSIBILITY: Employers are hit with a fee if the government subsidizes their workers' coverage. Contingent on approval by the Senate this week, the $2,000-per-employee fee would be assessed on the company's entire work force, minus an allowance. Companies with 50 or fewer workers are exempt from the requirement.

HELP FOR SMALL BUSINESSES: Businesses with 25 or fewer employees that offer health coverage to their work force will get tax credits. The credits will start this year and rise in 2014 to a maximum of 50 percent of the cost of premiums offered by the smallest businesses, those with 10 or fewer workers.

SUBSIDIES FOR INDIVIDUALS: The aid is available on a sliding scale for households making up to four times the federal poverty level, $88,200 for a family of four. Premiums for a family of four making $44,000 will be capped at around 6 percent of income.

HOW YOU CHOOSE YOUR HEALTH INSURANCE: Small businesses, the self-employed and the uninsured could pick a plan offered through new state-based purchasing pools called exchanges, opening for business in 2014. The exchanges will offer the same kind of purchasing power that employees of big companies benefit from. People working for medium-to-large firms will not see major changes. But if they lose their jobs or strike out on their own, they may be eligible for subsidized coverage through the exchange, and insurers could not deny them coverage.

HOW IT'S PAID FOR: The legislation cuts about $455 billion over 10 years from projected payment increases to hospitals, insurance companies and others under Medicare and other government health programs. Revenue increases over 10 years include: $210 billion from increasing the Medicare payroll tax; $107 billion from fees on insurance companies, drug makers and medical device manufacturers; $32 billion from the excise tax on high-value insurance plans; and $2.7 billion from a tax on indoor tanning services.

GOVERNMENT-RUN PLAN: No government-run insurance plan. People purchasing coverage through the new insurance exchanges will have the option of signing up for national plans overseen by the federal office that manages the health plans available to members of Congress. Those plans will be private, but one would have to be nonprofit.

ABORTION: The bill tries to maintain a strict separation between taxpayer dollars and private premiums that would pay for abortion coverage. No health plan will be required to offer coverage for abortion. In plans that do cover abortion, policyholders would have to pay for it separately, and that money would have to be kept in a separate account from taxpayer money. States could ban abortion coverage in plans offered through the exchange. Exceptions would be made for cases of rape, incest and danger to the life of the mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kwolf68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow looks just awful

Just kidding. There are a couple points I am not so hot for, but overall I am pleased with this outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is far from perfect
But it is a good start. I like that a non-profit option will be included in the exchanges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is it "up to age 26" or "until the 27th birthday" - I've seen it both ways...
Sen. Franken's recent email mentions the 27th b-day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's the same thing.
You are age 26 until your 27th Birthday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hmm - "Up to 26" sounds like up to the 26th b-day to me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Maybe that's why some are saying up 27th birthday
to avoid confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. I hate to admit my ignorance, but can someone explain to me
how this bill can at once cost $938 billion and also reduce the deficit by $143 billion in ten years time?

What is the $938 billion to be spent on? Implementation and administration of the insurance exchange and other parts of HCR?

And how will the deficit be reduced at the same time?

I'm confused....


COST: $938 billion over 10 years for the coverage expansion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

DEFICIT REDUCTION: CBO says the measure will reduce deficits by $143 billion over a decade.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Do you not realize the government already has health care expenditures?
Replacing those with lower costs can create a surplus theoretically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Can you elaborate?
Edited on Thu Mar-25-10 04:37 PM by SPedigrees
Are you saying that the govt spends more than this on health now? If so why do no dems point out to the repubs (when they're screeching about what HCR will cost) that govt will be spending LESS on health than now?

And what exactly are these govt paid health expenditures? Administration costs of medicare and medicaid? Or that plus all the $$ paid for care for medicare/medicaid patients as well?

I asked a fair question, but it hasn't yet been addressed. I'm not asking about taxes. I know where the govt's money comes from. I'm asking about how it is and will be spent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Largest tax increase ever.
Targeting Cadillac plans and Instituting taxes on medical devices and certain services taxing higher income individuals including cap gains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Can you please show the math behind that claim?
I haven't seen a claim like this - please provide the numbers behind that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Got it from Lawrence o'Donnell
He seems to know what he's talking about. He said he is jealous because prior to this he helped write the largest tax increase ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. I will qualify for a huge premium subsidy, which means that I will be able to
buy into a darned good plan.

I was thrilled for all the people who were definitely gonna benefit, but this is just the icing on the cake, that I benefit, too. I feel like the weight of the world has been lifted from my shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. CARE
What is missing from there is that no one is obligated to ensure you receive health CARE. No one is obligated to ensure you can pay the co-pays and deductibles. And there is an exemption from having to buy health insurance for certain meagar incomes with high rates. They're just expected to go without health insurance and health CARE. The closest hope is that they are near the CHC's and can afford to utilize them for the conditions they have.

The insurance company profits are well addressed though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-25-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Where is COST CONTROL? Some Nice things in here but i see nothing that stops Insurers from raising
rates due to the inclusion of pre-existing and other restrictions...all problems are resolved through higher premiums. I hope new useful amendments will come in over the years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC