Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"RNC rejects joint 'civility' statement"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:30 PM
Original message
"RNC rejects joint 'civility' statement"
RNC rejects joint 'civility' statement

The Republican National Committee has rejected a proposal from its Democratic counterpart to sign a joint “civility” statement, POLITICO has learned.

Various members of the DNC — including Chairman Tim Kaine, Executive Director Jen O’Malley Dillon and Communications Director Brad Woodhouse — contacted their respective RNC counterparts this week in hopes of getting RNC Chairman Michael Steele to co-sign a document with Kaine that, in part, called for “elected officials of both parties to set an example of the civility we want to see in our citizenry.”

“We also call on all Americans to respect differences of opinion, to refrain from inappropriate forms of intimidation, to reject violence and vandalism, and to scale back rhetoric that might reasonably be misinterpreted by those prone to such behavior,” read the proposed joint statement, which came at the end of a week which saw acts of vandalism and threats of violence directed at members of Congress from both parties, but mostly aimed at Democrats who voted “yes” on the health care bill.

Republicans see the statement as an attempt to force them to either reject the statement — allowing Democrats to say the RNC finds the incidents acceptable — or to sign on to something that the DNC would later wield against them.

The proposed statement was faxed and hand-delivered to the RNC at midmorning Friday. POLITICO learned Friday afternoon that the RNC would not sign the DNC statement.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/35096.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. RNC - Civility Statement? Its A Trap!
The amazing thing is that the RNC is so afraid that a civility statement would be used against them. Talking about admitting that they are an uncivil collection of *&^&%&^.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Some DUers think it is a trap, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. They might as well just hold a press conference admitting they don't want things to get better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. The shock would be if republicons
even pretended to be civil. They're cornered rabid rats and they're not feelin' it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Civility, like a dictionary, is foreign to them.
Edited on Fri Mar-26-10 10:51 PM by political_Dem
When have the Republicans ever thought of the greater good of society and above their own id-oriented desires?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bring it to the effin floor as a resolution...
Make them back it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Now that's a good idea!
Let's get them on record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I guess they realize their irrational mobs would find that unforgivable
Edited on Fri Mar-26-10 11:05 PM by chill_wind
and could turn on them next, even if they wanted to sign on (which is doubtful).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Interesting that the Repugs don't think they could use it against the Dems
if they signed it. Wonder why... :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because....
As they do with all solemn covenants, the Republicans knows that they have absolutely NO INTENTION of abiding by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC