Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DeMint Claims That Republican Senators Just Wanted ‘Some Debate And A Vote’ On Obama’s Nominees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 04:57 PM
Original message
DeMint Claims That Republican Senators Just Wanted ‘Some Debate And A Vote’ On Obama’s Nominees
Edited on Sun Mar-28-10 04:57 PM by ProSense

DeMint Claims That Republican Senators Just Wanted ‘Some Debate And A Vote’ On Obama’s Nominees

Yesterday, President Obama announced his intention to recess appoint 15 qualified nominees who have faced an “unprecedented level” of GOP obstruction to fill “critical” administration positions. From a statement by White House Communications Director Jen Psaki:

<...>

One of the people receiving a recess appointment is Craig Becker to serve on the National Labor Relations Board, which protects workers from unfair labor practices. As Psaki explained, although the “five member board has been trying to operate with only two members,” Becker has “been waiting for 261 days or over 8 months” to be confirmed.

<...>

Today on CBS’s Face the Nation, Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) tried to make the GOP obstruction sound reasonable, claiming that all they wanted was “some debate and a vote”:

DEMINT: Craig Becker, who was in the group that he appointed by executive fiat yesterday, is someone who has worked for unions his entire career. He put him on a board that is supposed to be unbiased arbitrators between businesses and unions. Democrats opposed this nomination. So, there’s bipartisan opposition. All we had asked for is some debate and a vote on this nominee. He decided to circumvent Congress again — which has become his style on so many issues — and just appoint him while we were out of town.

Watch it:

more




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who cares what Jim DeWaterloo thinks anymore?
Senate republicans are irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. oh, good grief...
:eyes:

these are the whiniest bunch of people...how quickly they forget John Bolton.

sheesh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. And Jim Dimwit is one of the worse...Just calling it like it is....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. A simple question for DeMint
Why haven't repukes debated and voted on Obama's nominees?
A simple answer. Because you all just want to say NO to anything Obama does. Period. See, even a simple mind like mine can figure that out. So stfu and crawl back into your corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Ah, but did the TV "interviewer" ask this obvious query?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kber Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well good
so as soon as they are back, they can have that debate and vote, right?

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. You had 261 days to do that, silly child.
Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. "all they wanted was “some debate and a vote”? The self declared party of no?


They just do not get it yet... the hypocrisy always backfires on them ..yet they still try again...don't they know about the "internets"? Already there are major news outlets reporting on Bolton and W's recess appointments.

And the fact that w got a lot more in by this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. demint oozes lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. People on the obstructionist side always say that they just want "debate"
I know because I've been on that side before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kdillard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
11.  Yeah well I have a bridge in Brooklyn and pigs can fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. lying sacks of rancid shit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Maybe Obama was just paying more attention to McCain
Edited on Sun Mar-28-10 06:40 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
and his stern *pledge* that there would be NO "further" cooperation with President Obama and/or the Democrats in Congress during the rest of the session (with no repudiation from anybody else).
:eyes:

DeMint can go suck it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. Lying sack of shit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think the debate had gone on long enough. Obama is behind Bush in the # of Nominee's appointed
because of Rethug obstructionism. Enough is enough. They didn't want a debate, they wanted to stop the nominees. Mr. Waterloo should at least be honest about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-28-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Bush made more than 200 recess appointments
No outrage from DeMint.

Even John Bolton said that recess appointments would be a good idea for the Obama administration:

"The Constitution provides for it and I'd be more than happy to see the president exercise his constitutional prerogatives and make some recess appointments."

John fucking Bolton.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/02/19/bush-recess-appointee-to_n_468893.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. Fuck the repukes, they had their eight years...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC