Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One reason 1994 will not replay itself in 2010

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:31 PM
Original message
One reason 1994 will not replay itself in 2010
The internet!! Thank you Al Gore for inventing the internets. :sarcasm:

But seriously, the internet has made it easier to raise funding for our candidates. And more difficult for Republicans to get away with their lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very True!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, the net was just getting popular around 1995, when I went to college.
AOL was popular then too. That gives me nightmares.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I subscribed to Delphi because it gave some access to the net,
which iirc AOHell did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. AOL was awful. My Mom still uses them but she is a conservative.
I make fun of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Paying for Email!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reason # 2: Health insurance reform (no matter how fucked up it is)
PASSED this time, unlike the Clinton debacle. The Dems have some momentum, and should pick yp speed as they crush the Republicans on jobs & a few other critical pieces of legislation. The Dems can end up looking like heroes, and could even GAIN seats in this off-year election if they can give people enough reason to go out & vote for them. The Republicans are playing a very dangerous game, and indulging in a potentially very expensive fantasy life if they truly believe their own propaganda that people don't want these reforms.

I can't get too excited about what we've seen so far from the Dems, but I can get fairly fired-up about not letting the likes of Romney, Cantor, Boner & Co. rule the roost.

Democratic mediocrity looks pretty good when stacked up against Republican evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I'm still very concerned with the traditional media.....
as they still influence way more folks than they should.

It is one of the reason that health care was so difficult to pass....
they shit reporting day in, day out, in where not only did they NOT debunk
Republican talking points, they pushed them.

I'm ready to get rid of them!

And yeah....thinking of Republicans having any more power than they have right now,
should give anybody a jolt to get their asses out to the polls....for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Maybe the best piece of data to take away from that is
that the Republicans and the Mega$limyMedia weren't able to kill it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. True.
GOP bullshit also gets debunked faster than you can say, "Google."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. back in 1992
the ONLY people who had Internet or the money for a computer that could go online, was the wealthy (conservative Republicans).
I got online in 1996... and i could not believe how hard-line EVERYWHERE was. yes I started out on AOL it was then and still is a bastion of closed minded conservative thought.

The first online book I was ever offered was an Ayn Rand book... To "straighten me out".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Hey I resent that. I'm not wealthy or a conservative Republican.
I was online before AOL, CompuServe or any other provider was around. Back then they were Bulletin Board Systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Not entirely true
Almost any computer could go online, and you didn't have to be rich. I went online in February, 1993 with GEnie online service. I had an Atari ST computer, and a then-impressive 2400 baud modem. Let me tell you, online was beautiful before it became commercialized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. True.
I didn't own a computer of my own until 1996, and I have never been rich, but I was online as a result of my job from 1991 onward. I had a work computer and email at that early date. In '96 I got my own computer and my own slooooow dialup Internet service for the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another reason would be no gun control legislation
Taking on the gun lobby is what harmed Clinton and the Democrats more than anything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another reason: The Repub's "Repeal & Replace" Pledge
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 02:50 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
Although it is unlikely to be successful (and realistically could only succeed with a Republican President AND a Republican-controlled Congress :puke:), the Republicans have given those of us who worked so hard to see HCR through a HUGE reason why it will be important, indeed critical, for us to keep Republicans from being able to control the House and/or Senate in the foreseeable future. While using their quixotic pledge to repeal HCR is almost surely a political ploy to fire up their base (more) and get them to the polls this November, they have unintentionally given US a reason to get out to the polls (and get other people to the polls) as well in November 2010 AND November 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. The REAL reason is this: in 1994, Republicans had been out of power for 40 years

Nobody could remember how bad they were at it.

In 2010, they've only been out of power for 4 years. We KNOW how they govern... it is fresh in our memory.


In 1994, they could make all kinds of promises about how they would govern if they were in power and America could believe them.... since none of them were around the previous time the GOP held congress.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. This, FTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Republicans as a whole had not been out of power for 40 years.
They just hadn't controlled Congress. But yeah, if anyone needed a memory refresher as to how they do when they control both houses of Congress, well, they've had one now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why shouldn't it go for the Dems the way it did in 2002
for the gops? Course, the gops had the corporatemediawhores deepfried in their pockets like they do now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cosmocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. 9-11 ...
The country was still very much realing after 9-11, and somehow the MSM had allowed the republicans brainwash the sheeple that the MFers who let it happen on their watch were the only people who could protect them from the lilly livered democrats who hated america and would allow the muslims to kill us all ...

Witness Max Cleeland, a veteran who had lost three of his limbs in the service of his country being ousted as a sitting senator for a douchebag republican who never served who painted Cleeland as "soft on terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. Politics has not gotten more honest since the advent of the internet
In fact, the internet years have been the worst political years since forever!

Impeachment, the super fair coverage of Gore/Bush, Florida recount and 8 years of proto-fascism and wall-to-wall lies. And the quick submarining of a popular president, the rise of this tea party crap and a public woefully uninformed on the basic issues.

It's swell that DU can talk to Kos and visa versa but the internet is, as a medium, the greatest purveyor and popularizer of lies we've seen yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC