Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WSJ: AHIP Cries "Uncle" and HHS/Dems Win (updated)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:52 PM
Original message
WSJ: AHIP Cries "Uncle" and HHS/Dems Win (updated)
Edited on Mon Mar-29-10 08:56 PM by ProSense

WSJ: AHIP Cries "Uncle" and HHS/Dems Win

by calchala

As to the recent uproar between AHIP and HHS, we have a winner, and the winner is HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Flap on Children's Pre-existing Conditions' letter settled

Looks like AHIP has decided to throw in the towel in regards to complying with the regulations saying they'll agree to the regulations.

Unfortunately the document is blocked by the Journal's "pay-for" section.

Here's what they released:

Insurers said they would comply with regulations the government issues requiring them to cover children with pre-existing conditions, after a dispute with lawmakers over interpretation of the new health-care legislation.

The Obama administration has made near-immediate coverage for sick children a priority in its health-care overhaul. But shortly after the bill's passage last week, insurers contended that the law didn't require them to accept sick children until 2014.

This is after HHS Secretary gave them a warning shot, that should they fail to comply with these regulations, they don't get access to that group of 40 million uninsured Americans.

more


Updated to add:

In a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, the industry's top lobbyist said insurers will accept new regulations to dispel uncertainty over a much-publicized guarantee that children with medical problems can get coverage starting this year.

Quick resolution of the doubts was a win for Obama — and a sign that the industry has no stomach for another war of words with a president who deftly used double-digit rate hikes by the companies to revive his sweeping health care legislation from near collapse in Congress.

"Health plans recognize the significant hardship that a family faces when they are unable to obtain coverage for a child with a pre-existing condition," Karen Ignagni, president of America's Health Insurance Plans, said in a letter to Sebelius. Ignagni said that the industry will "fully comply" with the regulations, expected within weeks.

The industry's response followed a sternly worded letter from Sebelius earlier in the day. In it, the administration's top health care official tried to put an end to questions about the law's intent and wording.

more



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody doesn't like this
news but I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Me too!!
ProSense is always on top of these things! Thanks Pro!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanusAscending Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. P.S.
kicked and recommended!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. and the premiums will be....
That's the crux of the matter, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. you are beyond help
it's pitiful that you'll even rag on kids getting coverage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't think anyone except the Cons are ragging about kids getting covereage
but the devil is in the details. From other reports (and I'll find many a link from "mainstream media" if needed), the insurance companies are trying to misunderestimate the new law to say that not only do they not have to cover these kids, they can increase rates for them to cover the cost if they want to.

So, I have to agree with IndianaGreen... at what price will they insure them? That is a reasonable question to ask at this point that is not mentioned in the links by OP. There probably is no info available at this time. Who knows?

Maybe that has been all taken care of with this strongly worded letter.

I want kids to have coverage. I don't think anyone here doesn't want them to have it. It is one of the few good things about this new law.

But I don't trust these insurance companies one iota...they'll be back with more nonsense I'm sure. It's their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. and there is no public option to keep the health industry in check
I expect higher co-pays and deductibles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. There will be a non-profit plan administered by the government to
keep the industry in check. That's huge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. In 4 years. Not so huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Insurance companies have to worry about being black balled from the state exchanges

the government will have all of the marbles and the insurance companies will have to be nice if they want to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Those exchanges will be run by the states, no?
I wouldn't put too much faith is several states participating in exchanges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. I knew it!
They didn't have a leg to stand on.

Add to that, being blacklisted from the upcoming Exchange(s).... I knew it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Go get 'em Kathleen!!!!
Or to borrow a phrase ... KATIE BAR THE DOOR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Nice job
putting these jerks back in their place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-29-10 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. This Could Have Been Used To Justify "Temporary" Medicare Coverage For Children...
...with pre-existing conditions until 2014. If the insurance companies were going to insist on holding out to 2014, then we could have passed a "temporary" Medicare bridge until 2014, and dare Republicans to vote against children with pre-existing conditions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. The insurance companies would love that.
They wouldn't have to deal with the risk involved in providing basic insurance for sick kids, and the parents would be under pressure to buy a supplemental policy to protect against catastrophic out-of-pocket costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hurting kids is never a good political strategy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Are people seriously this naive?
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 02:22 PM by Cleobulus
This is a PR move, the last thing the insurance companies want is to look like assholes to the American public, but that doesn't mean they will behave like little angels from now on. They caved on this, wait until people aren't looking, 6 months from now, when policies are going to be issued, I can see it now, the Insurance companies, to comply with the law, will "cover" that kid that has cancer, but won't pay for inject-able drugs in the policy, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. So even the Insurers know the Mandated 40 million is Sweet...
i am a bit surprised they would crack and follow regulation since their goal is to deny not give it. I am guessing every descent part of the bill will be contested as the years go by
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Well that didn't take long
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC