Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Playing the Long Game

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:22 AM
Original message
Playing the Long Game
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=playing_the_long_game

Playing the Long Game

Obama realizes that transformative presidents look past day-to-day disasters.

Paul Waldman | March 30, 2010 | web only

Playing the Long Game


(White House/Pete Souza)


On March 4, 2008, Hillary Clinton won surprise victories in primary elections in Texas and Ohio. At first, it seemed to be a momentous shift of the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, making Barack Obama's victory seem not so inevitable after all, as some had believed it to be since he won the Iowa caucus two months before.

But it quickly became apparent that Clinton's popular-vote wins were almost meaningless. In the contests that took place that day, Obama had actually garnered more delegates than Clinton. His march to the nomination continued unabated. By executing a carefully planned strategy of delegate accumulation and worrying less about the campaign's daily ups and downs, Obama bested a more seasoned rival to become the Democratic candidate.

That ability -- to see the entire contour of a lengthy political battle -- may be the most important factor in Obama's success. It got him to the White House, and it enabled him to achieve the most meaningful piece of social legislation in generations.


Remember when August's town hall meetings on health-care reform changed everything? Remember when it all hinged on Max Baucus' "Gang of Six"? Remember when Olympia Snowe held the fate of reform in her hands? Remember when Scott Brown's election killed any chance the bill had? At the time, all these things seemed so important that nothing else mattered. But what really mattered was the willingness to look beyond them, to see each as one step in a long journey -- obstacles that could be maneuvered around if necessary. Looking back, none seem as significant as they did then. But it took a particular kind of calm to realize that at the time.

snip//

The long road made many progressives worry that they couldn't tell where Obama's heart really was on health care. Did he truly support the public option as he said? If he was willing to bargain it away, what else would he compromise on? But the truth is that Obama has been remarkably consistent -- not on the details, which were always open to negotiation -- but on the idea that he could lean left or right for a moment along the way, so long as he kept moving forward.

Einstein famously said that politics is harder than physics. That's because there are so many different variables at play, and prior events aren't necessarily predictive of the future. Choose one strategic path over another, and you set in motion a hundred reactions from allies and opponents. Whatever else Obama accomplishes over his time in office, he will have put in place at least one major policy that will affect the country for decades. If all goes well, it will be refined and improved over that time. Barring an unlikely repeal, the health-care issue will take place on the field Obama sowed for many presidencies to come. When we debate health-care changes to the system 20 years from now, we’ll be debating changes to the system this president put in place. Because he was able to keep his eyes focused into the distance, Obama will have changed the trajectory of the country in a way most presidents never do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recced to cancel out the person that thinks Obama should blindly
chase disaster after disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. He's playing chess!
:hide: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. ..

}( Thanks to grantcart in the BOG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. If he's playing the "long game", he's doing a piss poor job
He allowed the vast support for the public option to be whittled away to this monstrosity of a mandated monopoly gift to the insurance industry. He has allowed an opening for the insurance industry to bleed the middle and working class dry, while simultaneously limiting a woman's right to choose.

If this is his idea of playing the good "long game", I'd hate to see what the bad version is.

Of course, given his corporate sponsors, perhaps this is his idea of playing the long game well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. We're not supposed to notice the corporate stranglehold on
seemingly all our government agencies. We're just supposed to ADORE them. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. +1 Are we supposed to see the LONG game when he does to SSI what Clinton did to American workers?
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 11:37 AM by Vincardog
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Your fear is just that..nothing to do with reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That is the same answer I got about NAFTA. That reality worked out well didn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. ..
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's your piss poor opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. True, that is my opinion,
One however that is backed up with facts. What's your opinion backed up with? Oh, yeah, rah, rah and pom-poms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. some people do not have a "long time" for this "long game"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yes a well played "long con"
Follow the money and the "health care".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's ignorant talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I want to see all the treasonous m$$$mwhores and the lying dinos exposed to The People for what they
are..Dividers who are in it only for their bottom line. You've had a bad run, suckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dccrossman Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
7. The point is the focus, not whether you agree with the target
Like it or not, the HCR bill has changed the trajectory, and it did require an overly pragmatic long view to get it done. You may not agree with the changes, but it has changed things. In a massive way. Many for good, many for ill.

Future conversations on health care reform now start from an entirely different playing field.

My own hope is that the changes will cause the whole system to destroy itself. As employers decide to pay the fine/tax, rather than pay for over-priced insurance, hopefully the exchanges will be able to handle it or Medicare will finally be expanded to create a simpler method for those people to get coverage. (Preferably Medicare, I'm not a fan of insurance companies.)

Yee-hah

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
18. Which is why I don't get all doomy and gloomy when things look a bit uncertain.
I trust Obama. He may not win them all, but he will come closer than anyone else can. I swear to God. He will turn this disaster the GOP left us and things will take a long delayed turn for the better. Who knows, we may even change the wing nut bent of the Republican Party. They can adapt or become moribund, totally irrelevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC