Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone ending up owing a lot more on taxes than expected this year?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:40 PM
Original message
Anyone ending up owing a lot more on taxes than expected this year?
Last year I set up our W-4's so that I would break pretty even this year.

I didn't even think to change them when they started taking less from our checks. I figured it was a credit I would get anyway and still be pretty even.

Didn't happen that way.

Apparently they took 300 less from husbands check and 800 less from mine (Which seems excessive).

I now owe them 1300 dollars instead of being close to even. I paid in 1100 less than last year.

I was getting excited with all the stories of great returns this year. Bummer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Seedersandleechers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. same thing happened to me also,
I always break even and now I'm having to pay over $440 for federal. Don't know why that is but I increased my 403B to 20 percent of my income. Hope that works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
36. Things like that, I ask a tax consultant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dalaigh lllama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems to me "I paid in 1100 less than last year"
means you paid less this year -- or am I not reading that correctly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Last year from our paychecks we paid in 8800, this year we only paid in 7700.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. So my bill this year would have been only 200 bucks instead of 1300, if they hadn't taken less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did you take your Making Work Pay?
That would be $800 that would help. I suppose if you don't have any kids or do any energy improvements on your home, you might not have many additional tax credits to help out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Ha, I've got all those plus some more. Turbo tax is saying the $800 credit was given on our paycheck
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Maybe you make too much for it
"The Making Work Pay credit starts to be reduced for individual filers making $75,000 in modified adjusted gross income, or $150,000 for joint filers. The credit is reduced by 2% of the amount of income in excess of the $75,000 (or $150,000) threshold. The credit is completely phased out for individuals making $95,000 or more, or $190,000 for joint filers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. You are supposed to file the Schedule M
The Making Work Pay tax credit will need to be claimed on the 2009 and 2010 tax returns to ensure that the amount of the credit is properly calculated. This is true even though tax withholding is being adjusted now to reflect this new tax credit. The IRS explains it this way, “Though all eligible taxpayers will need to claim the credit when they file their 2009 income tax return next year, the benefit will generally be spread out over the paychecks they receive beginning this spring and continue until the end of the year.”

http://taxcreditsact.com/money-saving/making-work-pay-tax-credit/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Did that, then the software said it did not change my amount because it was taken out already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I would do it manually then
Because you should be getting that credit. Ask Frenchie about it maybe too. Or maybe you lost some eic when you lost your dependent too. That's always a shocker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I am thinking there is a screw up somewhere and hoping its not with my employers withholding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. that Schedule M - Make Work Pay......
Edited on Tue Mar-30-10 06:54 PM by FrenchieCat
It appears that mostly everyone gets it who had earned income as there was no real credit that occurred technically during the year....simply that the tax tables were lowered, and therefore people paid less in and ended up with a bigger check. That may account for what happened to you. However, you are able to take this credit, as long as you don't go over the threshold MAGI.

Here is more information on how it works.....

How much is the credit?

The maximum allowable credit is $400 for working individuals and up to $800 for married taxpayers filing joint returns. The credit is figured at a rate of 6.2% of earned income. It will phase out for individual taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income over $75,000 or $150,000 for married couples filing jointly; the phase out is at 2%, which means taxpayers who earn more than those limits will still qualify for the credit but will not receive the full amount.

Since I already had money taken out of my paycheck, does that mean I can't claim the credit?

No. If you were paid a wage or salary by an employer, you saw a little more in your paycheck over the year because of the adjusted withholding tables. This means less money was withheld from your check. You did not actually receive any credit during the year.

A credit is a dollar-for-dollar reduction in your tax bill. When you calculate your tentative tax due, credits are applied to that tentative tax and reduce your overall tax bill. You can think of credits as an additional "payment" toward your tax due. So, in this case, a $400 Making Work Pay credit will reduce your tax bill by $400.

It's not a windfall, however. The purpose of the credit is to offset the reduced federal withholding you paid in over the year with the adjusted tables. If you qualify for the full Making Work Pay credit (and most taxpayers should qualify), you should end up with no difference at the end of the tax year. The tax rates did not change -- you just paid in less.
http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2010/02/19/are-you-eligible-for-the-making-work-pay-tax-credit/


and here's more to reiterate and clarify:

BANKRATE'S 2010 TAX GUIDE

TAXES

Claiming the Making Work Pay credit

By Kay Bell • Bankrate.com

TAX TIP No. 12

Most workers saw a bit more in their paychecks from April to December last year. The few extra dollars each pay period was courtesy of the Making Work Pay tax credit, which came to $400 per eligible individual or $800 if you're married and file a joint return.

Now that filing season has arrived, credit recipients will have to account for that money by filing a new form, Schedule M.

The IRS wants this new document if you file a long Form 1040 or the slightly shorter 1040A. Nonresident taxpayers who send in Form 1040NR also will use this new schedule. Folks who can use the shortest return, 1040EZ, will simply use a work sheet on the back of that form.

Schedule M also addresses the $250 sent last year to folks who receive various retirement benefits.

Why the extra work?

The goal of all this extra work is to reconcile the confusion taxpayers and employers encountered when the new credit and revised withholding tables went into effect last April.

Although most eligible workers effectively got the credit amount because Uncle Sam took less money from their paychecks, that's not the official credit claim. The IRS still wants every filer to fill out the new Schedule M.

Once you complete Schedule M, you'll transfer the dollar figure you come up with on line 14 of that document to either line 63 of Form 1040, line 40 of Form 1040A or line 60 of Form 1040NR. Form 1040EZ filers will take their work sheet calculation and enter it on the EZ's line 8.

All these lines on the various tax returns are in the section that records all your tax payments. This includes withholding amounts from your W-2s, certain 1099s and any estimated tax payments you made.

Essentially, at filing time the credit is treated as additional withholding that can increase your refund or reduce any tax you might owe.

Who might be affected?

Schedule M could benefit, or cost, some filers depending upon their personal tax circumstances.

If your employer didn't start using the new tables soon enough (or at all) and you had too much withheld, Schedule M will sort that out and make sure you get your full $400 credit for 2009.

Similarly, if your boss did reduce your withholding, but you're not eligible for the credit, that too will be taken into account on the new schedule.

This could happen if you can be claimed as a dependent on another taxpayer's return.

You also might have had too little collected under the revised payroll Making Work Pay tables if you and your spouse both work, each had your withholding reduced by $400, but your combined modified adjusted income, or MAGI, makes you ineligible for the credit.

The Making Work Pay amount is reduced for joint filers whose MAGI is between $150,000 and $190,000. Other taxpayers whose MAGI is more than $75,000 but less than $95,000 also won't get the full credit amount. If your adjusted income is greater than the maximum for your filing status, then you won't get any of the credit.

And self-employed folks who have no payroll withholding taken out of their earnings will be able to claim the credit on Schedule M if they didn't adjust their quarterly estimated tax payments to reflect the tax break.

Retirees, too

Schedule M also applies to the $250 payment to certain retirees that was authorized by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, otherwise known as the stimulus package, signed into law last February.
These checks went to persons who get any kind of Social Security benefit including retirement, survivors and disability benefits; Railroad Retirement payments; Veterans Administration, or VA, disability pensions; and most people who receive Supplemental Security Income, or SSI.

If in addition to the retiree check, you (or your spouse if you file jointly) worked and you paid less in withholding thanks to the Making Work Pay credit, you'll need to file Schedule M. That form will account for these two tax benefits, since your credit amount will be reduced by your $250 retiree payment.
http://www.bankrate.com/finance/taxes/claiming-the-making-work-pay-credit-1.aspx


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
38. what????
Turbo Tax says the $800 was given on your paycheck?

It most likely was...BUT!! You still get to claim the credit on your tax return. That is what makes up for the lowered withholding. I used an online software too - I think TaxAct - and it figured the making work pay tax credit just fine. Something is seriously wrong if they aren't letting you claim the credit. You need to do a manual return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like you made a mistake in estimating...
I let mine ride from the year before and I received a much larger Federal return this year. Naturally that was all but eaten up by my CA increase... thanks, Arnold! Jeez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Actually I had readjusted to take more because I knew I would be losing a dependant this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elfin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Less here. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Making Work Pay saved the day!
Be sure to check out form M - Making Work Pay.
I owed less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. I had a child tax credit...
...expire, and the Making Work Pay credit brought things back to basically a wash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Yep, same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't even want to say how much I owe this year but it's my own damn fault
For anybody who takes distributions from an IRA, you will remember that you weren't required to do so in 2009 because of the recession. So I didn't. What I ignored was that I used those distributions to make quarterly payments to the IRS. So at the end of the year, no withholding, no payments and a big ass tax liability. I have to pay a penalty for not withholding or paying any tax during the 2009 tax year. I was anticipating a ration of shit from Mrs. T but she realizes if we had made the payments we'd already be out the money that we now have to pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
11. yes, but its because I got laid off, cashed in my 401k and no withholding was made
for state from the 401K (which I didn't understand or they didn't tell me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah
...but mine was due to a contract job that I paid a little under on estimated taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iangmac Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
20. CA Tax Rates Increased
If you work in CA, the state tax rates increased during the middle of the year. So if you adjusted your withholding in early 2009, you would have needed to adjust it again after the tax changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Texas, no state tax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
23. I owe almost $5,000. So much for that 95% tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Are you self employed or a contract worker?
Because taxes did not increase, and they indeed went down.....

So what happened differently to you in 2009 from 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. I'm retired and living on a fixed income & am far from wealthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
33. That's a tax cut to 95% of the people...
Not a 95% tax cut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. Yes, I knew that. I just figured I fell within the 95% of the people
getting a cut since I'm far from rich and am retired on a fixed income. If I don't fall within the 95% range then who the Hell does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. We got less back this year,
about half of what we got last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Then something changed specific to you,
because again, taxes didn't not increase....
even if you made over $250,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Don't know what it was, almost the same deductions
we took last year, our property tax actually dropped about 100 dollars. Other than the fact that I used H&R Block, I can't think of anything different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Well of course, without numbers, I can't make an analysis.....
That Schedule "M" credit is meant for use by those who make under a certain threshold, to offset the lower amount taken as withholding each pay period....to ensure that most taxpayers would not have to pay additional when filing their returns.

But having prepared taxes of all kinds over the past 25 years, I can only guess that you must have earned (you and your hubby combined) above the threshold of the "M" credit limitation....
but that the lowered tax tables would have reduced your withholdings taken out of your check each payday since spring....and that is why your refund was reduced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damonm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
29. Nope. hefty refunds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. No. We paid much less than usual. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
31. Got an extra 1,000 that saved the day.. be sure to check schedule M..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
34. No
I actually got more back than I was expecting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-30-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. I got a lot more back than I ever expected. I was able to claim
things I've never been able to claim before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Cool.
Good for you! Enjoy! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
40. I owed. It sucked.
It was because of all the freelance contractor work I do. I think I fixed the problem but it didn't help for this year. Sigh....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
41. We got back a big amount, same as the last five years.
We have two dependents and I don't work as I stay home with my two little ones. Of course, the big amount always goes fast, to pay off credit cards and other bills but we are happy to get it back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KathieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
44. We owed 1,100 this year. Last year we received a refund of 800...
I think it had something to do with my husband getting a second job last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. I just read an article about it affecting 2 job households. With too much credit being given.
I think thats what happened to us. 1100 less was withheld than last year. Thats way more than the credit should have allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #45
48. Here's the deal....
The Making Work Pay Credit was $400 per a person and $800 for a couple.

If you're married, they shrank the withholding tables so that you'd get about $600 extra in your paycheck during the course of the year -- so you got most of the credit "up front."

The problem for couples who like a small refund is that EACH paycheck got shrunk by $600 -- that's $1,200 in "up front" money for a credit that's only $800.

And it gets worse. If you or your spouse worked a second job -- shrinkage there, too. If you or your spouse are collecting Social Security, VA Disability or other government pensions, there was a $250 bump in your check last May-June and that comes off you $800r Credit.

So under the wrong circumstances, a couple could easily find themselves with a $1000 or greater tax liability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
46. nope
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
47. Opposite for me.
We're getting more back, but that's because we forget how much the college tuition credit really helps. With two sons in college, we're getting a nice check back to help out with what I hope is the final year or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
49. Yes. I even got pinged for student loan interest that was supposed to be held for the two years I
was in AmeriCorps. It was bullshit, still trying to recover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. Exactly the opposite for me. Got a refund from state and only owed $281 to Feds.
Previous years, we've owed between $700-1,100 to Feds.

I'm thrilled this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-01-10 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
51. Nope. Got more back than I have in years.
Thanks to Make America Works and deductibles for putting in new doors and windows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC