Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barack Obama 10/08: "explore new ways to get more oil, and that includes off-shore drilling."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 08:55 AM
Original message
Barack Obama 10/08: "explore new ways to get more oil, and that includes off-shore drilling."
Y'all excuse me while I do some more "apologizing."

You know, a lot of you remember the tragedy of 9/11 and where you were on that day and, you know, how all of the country was ready to come together and make enormous changes to make us not only safer, but to make us a better country and a more unified country.

And President Bush did some smart things at the outset, but one of the opportunities that was missed was, when he spoke to the American people, he said, "Go out and shop."

That wasn't the kind of call to service that I think the American people were looking for.

And so it's important to understand that the -- I think the American people are hungry for the kind of leadership that is going to tackle these problems not just in government, but outside of government.

And let's take the example of energy, which we already spoke about. There is going to be the need for each and every one of us to start thinking about how we use energy.

I believe in the need for increased oil production. We're going to have to explore new ways to get more oil, and that includes offshore drilling. It includes telling the oil companies, that currently have 68 million acres that they're not using, that either you use them or you lose them.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/07/presidential.debate.transcript/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. He's in big trouble with DU for doing exactly what he told us he'd do.
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 09:07 AM by Richardo
...instead of being the progressive's Pygmalion.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/

101 of 500+ promises kept in a little over 1 year.

17 broken, some of which, like the public HC option and home mortgage adjustments, are big disappointments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. And when you state that, people wrongly think that means you want to silence them.
Though if somebody can be "silenced" on the internet, they have serious issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks.... also -- August 2008
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/08/01/obama_opens_the_door_to_offsho.html

"Sen. Barack Obama suggested he could accept an expansion of offshore oil drilling today if it is in a broader package of energy measures that would free the logjam on energy bills in Congress.

"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an interview with The Palm Beach Post."

"Obama, through his Senate office, issued a written statement welcoming a proposal sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators -- five from each party -- that would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico within 50 miles of Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the oil and gas development along its coast."

&

http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/campaign-2008/2008/08/04/obama-shows-new-openness-to-offshore-oil-drilling.html

"Sen. Barack Obama today softened his opposition to new offshore drilling, saying in a speech at Michigan State University that he is "willing to consider" allowing additional drilling in a limited number of offshore areas if it helps Congress pass energy
legislation."

"In his speech, Obama indicated that his shift on offshore drilling is political, not philosophical. "I still don't believe that's a particularly meaningful short-term or long-term position," he said, but added that he did not want to make "the perfect the enemy of the good."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. another good one, thanks. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nothing to apologize for. People can criticize the decision and it's a legitimate criticism
But just as with Afghanistan, no one can say that he's doing something different than what he said during the campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
4. You're right of course, why anyone thought a man who actually believes in "clean coal"
is any friend of the environment is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
5. Damn those facts! You are ruining a lot of good rants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. At least I knew what I was voting for when I voted for him.
A mixed bag, for sure, but the best of the available choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bottom line: this gets us an energy bill.
And moves us forward. Smells like HCR to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Maybe It's Reverse Psychology.......
the Repugs take the opposite position that he does because they want him to fail. Maybe he's using that. He says open up offshore drilling - and the Repugs - say 'no'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I await that Palin woman's response. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. That's what my husband said this morning, too
:hi: I knew Pres. Obama said he was open to this idea while he was campaigning. I wasn't happy with it then and I am disappointed now, but not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. MSNBC is now running the headline "Is Obama stealing the GOP's thunder on energy?"
I think they've already figured out that portraying this as a "broken campaign promise" is one of those non-hunting dogs. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
13. Drill baby drill. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Now Obama = Palin?
Yeah, he hasn't really accomplished anything that she wouldn't have already done if she and McCain had won.

:eyes:

Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
15. I disagreed with him then and I still disagree now.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. thats my position too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. So...because he promised it, we have to support it now.
Sure thing :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Campaign promises supersede doing the right thing
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 02:19 PM by Oregone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. So did you speak out against it when he stated his position back then?
I mean here at DU...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Speak against it? I was advocating it!
Edited on Wed Mar-31-10 04:10 PM by Oregone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. And now Canada bought Volvo!
Darn Canucks.

I remember reading that before and thought it was hilarious - thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. What? I thought China got Volvo just recently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. LOL! Yes - but you parallel China with Canada in your linked post.
"melamine tainted timber . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. haha. Gotcha!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. No. But don't lie or act shocked when he says he's doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. So I guess next time we find a candidate we agree with 100%, or -
Don't vote at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. SHIT!!! There he goes keeping his word again...../sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Thanks. I wrote to David Shuster who called it a "flip-flop."
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleobulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. You can't extract blood from a turnip, and this is no different...
The oil isn't there, or, I should say, there isn't enough oil there to make a difference, and as far as energy independence, there is no way we can drill ourselves into a solution there, there is not enough oil off the coasts to do that, even including Alaska.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
29. I like the sentence after the bold-faced one in the OP.
<snip>
It includes telling the oil companies, that currently have 68 million acres that they're not using, that either you use them or you lose them.
<snip>

The oil companies which have all those permits and leases, haven't really done any new offshore oil drilling on a large scale. Yet, they always whine, complain, and get the Repuke Congress critters on their side to say we need offshore oil drilling to stave off high oil and gas prices.

As I said in another thread, when the Repukes were in full control of the government, and the oil companies had their friendliest political climate in decades, only one, count'em, ONE, offshore rig was ever installed in those 6 years. You'd think with all that in their pockets and corner, they'd be putting in rigs all over the U.S. coastline. Nope.

That lone rig was installed in 2005 off the Gulf Coast of Texas/Louisiana.

That rig is owned by...



wait for it...



BRITISH Petroleum. A foreign oil company. Not a U.S. oil company.

Seems to me that offshore rig was 'payment' by the Bush admin in exchange for Britain sending troops to Iraq in 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-31-10 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. and he spoke of a public option as well, and babbled nonsense about clean coal
We didn't get a public option, and there is no such thing as clean coal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC