LeftyAndProud60
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-10 02:06 PM
Original message |
| Did the media do polls about re-election 1 yr into Bush and Clinton's 1st term? |
|
I really didn't pay as much attention, so did they do this then? Obama has accomplished more in 1 yr than Bush did in 2 terms.
|
| Lost4words
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. fuck no thay didnt cause God appointed Bush. |
| joeybee12
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I disagree...Bush accomplished a lot more...it's just that they were really, |
|
really bad accomplishments...and yes, they did polls...Bush was not very high in favorables until 9-11.
|
| zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 4. I heard that one poll actually had W at 44% |
|
and Osama bin Laden at 43% ...
a.f.
but then, it wouldn't have surprised me if Faux had done a poll like "Which would you think the unpatriotic Dummycrats vote for today (10/2001): George W. (God's chosen) Bush, or Osama bin Laden?"
|
| missmel224
(35 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I heard that supposedly in the poll |
|
they did for Clinton, that he was losing in that re-election poll by 15 points. Obama's is dead even.
|
| Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-01-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. Clinton yes. Bush probably not, but only because of 9/11 |
|
Edited on Thu Apr-01-10 04:19 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
