Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PSST! Hey Obama... Oil Leak In The Great Barrier Reef....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 08:25 PM
Original message
PSST! Hey Obama... Oil Leak In The Great Barrier Reef....
You know I love ya Obama, but I'm just sayin...

http://www.smh.com.au/environment/oil-leaking-from-grounded-coal-ship-in-great-barrier-reef-20100404-rl6y.html

"Oil patches have been spotted in the Great Barrier Reef near a grounded coal carrier off central Queensland, a statement from Maritime Safety Queensland has confirmed.

The vessel is expected to require salvage assistance.

The 230 metre-long bulk coal carrier Shen Neng 1 ran aground about 70 kilometres east of Great Keppel Island just after 5pm yesterday, sparking a national oil spill response plan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. ut-oh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. The term vessel may
mitigate any responsibility, no matter how ephermeral, Obama may have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't Most Oil Spills Come From Tankers?
I'm not grasping how this is somehow Obama's responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm disappointed in Obama for not having more control of Aussie waters
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. So ban all international transport by ships?
The ships must carry fuel to transport things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-03-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. So. Was it double-hulled?
Which increases the chances of a spill-free voyage?

I doubt it. Exxon did take the VALDEZ and repair it. Even though studies have shown that double-hulling will help the environment, EVEN THOUGH EXXON HAD THE EXXON VALDEZ FUCKING OIL SPILL THAT WE ARE ALL STILL PAYING FOR, Exxon chose not to double-hull the VALDEZ during her drydock and repair before changing her name and shipping her off to serve in I think it was the Caspian.

Just sayin' right along with you, indeed.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Being a coal freighter, probably not.
Are you of the opinion that all ships be double-hulled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Pretty much.
Edited on Sun Apr-04-10 07:47 PM by texastoast
Pollution-carrying vessels and diapers work pretty well with backup-plan mentality driving the processes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm not in favor of opening up any new drilling offshore or much at all BUT
this is a barge leak.

Folks do need to stop pretending that off shore platforms don't have issues and when they do it is a very substantial problem but doing this allows certain quarters to mock and act a fool.

Smarter and less ridiculous minds could look at the damage as a related example but many need straight line information since if dots have to be connected then there is plenty of room for faux plausible deniability, red herrings, mocking, wait and see, attacking the messenger, and miscellaneous dodging of the general issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC