Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Bob Packwood responsible for our economic crash?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-04-10 07:28 PM
Original message
Is Bob Packwood responsible for our economic crash?
Local columnist for The Oregonian writes his Sunday missive about Packwood and the loss of concensus and civility in the Senate. And the columnist falls for the framing!

Columnist Steve Duin: "Packwood -- who resigned under pressure in 1995 -- is now a stranger to the Senate, as are civility and sincerity. But when we spoke last week about his crowning political achievement, engineering the passage of the 1986 Tax Reform Act, Packwood convinced me that the lessons of that era, and compromise, might serve President Obama and the Senate leadership in the effort to rein in middle-class entitlements. That effort is, seemingly, an economic imperative."

Uh, no. It's only an imperative as long as the U.S. deploys a war machine that costs (among other items) $390,000 per soldier per year.
End imperialism, and there will be money enough to pay for the retirement promised to our elders.

But another item revealed to today's readers is that Bob Packwood considers the Tax Reform Act of 1986 his crowning glory. Is the misery of our citizens over the last several decades on his shoulders?

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/steve_duin/index.ssf/2010/04/bob_packwoods_reflection_on_19.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. well, he was prochoice so liberals kinda liked him but his fiscal policy views
just reveal him to be an ordinary Republican at the core. Everything for the upper class and "reined in" entitlements for the middle and lower classes. It is ever thus...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. There's a blast from the past.
Had to sweep away a few cobwebs and turn on some auxiliary lights to find that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 02:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. When you have to look to Bob Packwood for discussion of civility,
you are really desperate.

:wtf:

They could have talked to anyone. They had to pick one of Oregon's most embarrassing political figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. box wine and tongue,
and all those little slips of paper "people" put in his pocket that became the tax bill.

Wrote him a letter once in opposition of the first Gulf War; got a two-page rambling reply, full of typos and unsigned on his letterhead...what a hoot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Seriously?
I have never, in my life, gotten any personal correspondence from a politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Before the days of emails and fear of "white powder" mail -
when members of Congress actually opened it and didn't toss them, I almost always got replies - and except for the one from Packwood, they were signed. I used to write individual letters to each and every committee member when an issue so moved me. My family used to say that I was probably on a "watch list" because of all the letters in our mailbox from Senators and Congressmen (very few women in those days).
I was led to believe that one letter carried the same weight as 1,000 people - I don't think is true with emails, as the replies I get from the Senators in my State and Congressman say the same thing regardless of the subject. I no longer write to entire committee members.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought Bob Packwood was a porn star
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC