Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama emboldened for another Supreme Court pick (AP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 03:45 AM
Original message
Obama emboldened for another Supreme Court pick (AP)
Obama emboldened for another Supreme Court pick

Associated Press Writers Ben Feller And Charles Babington, - Sat Apr 10, 8:18 pm ET

WASHINGTON – Emboldened by success the first time around, President Barack Obama is likely to pick the Supreme Court nominee he wants and let the confirmation fight proceed from there, putting huge emphasis on a justice who would bring a fight-for-the-little-guy sensibility to the job.

Politics will certainly play into Obama's calculus: He no longer has the votes in the Senate to overcome the delaying tactic known as the filibuster, and a minority Republican Party in fierce opposition to Obama's agenda has little incentive to hand him a win just months before House and Senate elections.

But Obama's strategy worked when he chose Sonia Sotomayor to replace Justice David Souter last year — announce the criteria he deems the most vital for a nominee, vet the nominees with no embarrassing gaffes or leaks, and pick the one with whom he feels the most comfort.

Confirmability was a factor then, not a driver. Expect much the same now.

<more at> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100411/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_obama_supreme_court


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. GO OBAMA!
DO IT RIGHT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. He might as well - the GOPers will piss and moan no matter WHO he
nominates.
If we are going to have another drawn out fight, make it for a good reason.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't know who said that, but I hope their sources are reliable
Now is not the time to show condescension.

The Republicans would filibuster if Obama nominated Orrin Hatch or John Bonehead.

They'll definitely try to obstruct anyone qualified.

It's not like they're gonna become the "Party of Maybe" any time soon.

So pick someone qualified!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. How frustrating it must be ..
to be the 4 non facist Judges are the Supreme Court..just waiting for the dirty 5 to shoot America's Democracy down at any given chance.

Good Luck to the next one and may he/she be brilliant and have a long healthy life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-11-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. I bet he finds a way to pick someone from Goldman Sachs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Like he did the first time?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. And You Base That On Just Pulling Stuff Out Of Your Ass?
And because Sotomayor is such a corporate stooge? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
7. Who says he's "emboldened"?
What a BS headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Who said he's not? He's been emboldened ever since he got the HCR bill passed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. BS headline attempts to mind-read the president.
Or to present him as "uppity," maybe.

There's no source for the adjective in the headline, and no other support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sketchy Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I think you've pegged it regarding the headline
Whatever happened to just reporting the news in an objective manner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. "Emboldened by success the first time around..." How do you get "uppity" from that?
It makes perfect sense that a president would feel emboldened by success. Nothing wrong with calling Obama "emboldened." You can see just in his demeanor how he's been emboldened by his past successes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. See, supporting that adjective in any way would entitle them to use it.
As it is, it just sits there, another invented MSM narrative. What is the purpose of the word? is it just lazy, or is it an "uppity" dog-whistle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-12-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I don't see how you get a "dog whistle" of "uppity" from "emboldened." I hear it as "strong
leader who has the wind at his back from past wins."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC