Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GALLUP: Banking Reform Sells Better When "Wall Street" Is Mentioned - regulation supported by 50/36.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 06:35 AM
Original message
GALLUP: Banking Reform Sells Better When "Wall Street" Is Mentioned - regulation supported by 50/36.
Banking Reform Sells Better When "Wall Street" Is Mentioned
Americans favor regulating Wall Street banks by 50% to 36%
by Lydia Saad

PRINCETON, NJ -- Americans are about evenly divided on the merits of giving the federal government new powers to regulate large banks and major financial institutions; however, they offer greater support when the issue is more specifically framed as regulating "Wall Street banks."



When Wall Street is not mentioned, net public support (percentage in favor minus percentage opposed) for banking reform legislation is +3 points, but when it is mentioned, net support is +14.

Gallup measured support for enhanced federal regulation of banking using both wordings in its April 17-18 Daily tracking. A random half-sample of respondents was asked the "Wall Street" wording; the other half was asked about banks and major financial institutions, generally.

On both questions, Democrats are more likely than Republicans to support banking reform. Seven in 10 Democrats favor the proposed new federal regulatory powers, regardless of the wording. By contrast, Republicans show greater support for reform when "Wall Street" is invoked than when it is not (35% vs. 22%).



<SNIP>

http://www.gallup.com/poll/127448/Banking-Reform-Sells-Better-Wall-Street-Mentioned.aspx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. So that means nothing. The margin for error is plus minus 4 percent.
Edited on Tue Apr-20-10 07:02 AM by RandomThoughts
one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.


The difference might mean nothing.

Since 4% is the margin for error.

If 4% off in each poll in opposite directions, you could flip the results for how many favor reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. doesn't mean nothing
just means you can say it with 90% confidence rather than 95% confidence. That does mean something: it assigns a probability that one is right, given certain assumptions about the underlying distributions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You do make a valid point.
Statistically, with many more polls, it might mean something. And it is possible it might mean something.


Honestly there are probably 5 out of 100 people that only heard reform on the question about bank reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't get why the poll is just about even when Wall Street isn't mentioned.....
..... The "Horrid Big Government" mindf**k campaign has been a smashing success. A good portion of the American public lacks critical thinking skills.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkyDaddy7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. You NAILED it!!!!
"...the American public lacks critical thinking skills."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's a wonder that people have to be reminded of Wall Street. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. WTF is wrong with people? How can so few people be iin favor of it?
Are you serious? A majority of Republicans oppose it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Because Fox News and their leadership oppose it
That's why. They march lock step with corporate interests and have no clue what they are doing. The USA is full of idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. I don't doubt it.
Ask people if the law should be able to punish Wall Street, and most will say yes.
Ask people if the government should be able to punish Wall Street, and the numbers will be quite different.

The law, of course, IS the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. I hope all the Dems are taking note of this important framing issue
and I will bet FAUX and the rest will NEVER mention Wall Street reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE1947 Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. Tie Mitch and his buddies to Wall Street, TARP, and everything Bushie
Wall Street loves Repubs. This is a winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC