saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:01 AM
Original message |
Palin's too dumb and her staff's too incompetent... |
|
Here's an interesting behind-the-scenes dish on Palin's questionable staff from NEW YORK magazine: http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/04/why_palins_biggest_presidentia.htmlThe tales told suggest "skits" but may also be sustained conditions surrounding Palin's personal cognitive deficits and her poor judgment in communications break-downs and organizational temper-tantrums.
|
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:13 AM
Response to Original message |
secondwind
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:26 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Sarah is on Times "most influential people" along with Obama and SCOTT BROWN. !!! |
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Hot dog. Scott Brown, you say?! |
Patiod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. OT: Like Palin, I now can't think of Scott Brown w/o seeing SNL skit |
|
I keep envisioning him as Jon Hamm, dancing like a flapper in Senator Byrd's head.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. SNL can make things stick. It's that way with me and Jerry Ford, |
|
portrayed by Chevy Chase years ago as a bumbling dolt.
Well...
|
pundaint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
18. Really, he is the epitome of being in the right place when the DLC was being rejected. |
|
Oh! look what I found, is not quite the same as being influential.
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. Hitler and Stalin were on that list at one point. |
|
"Most influential" does not necessarily mean "most wonderful".
|
tanyev
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I confess I'd love to see her as one of the candidates in a vicious GOP primary. |
|
It could take the GOP decades to recover from that.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. True. It would be one of those long, ongoing feud things that |
|
occurs in politics now and then and the GOP would barely survive it.
|
Bette Noir
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. Except for the chance that she'd win. |
|
She's no stupider than GW or Dan Quayle, and not eviler than Dick Cheney.
I was going to say, "No eviler than Nixon," but this new generation of Republicans has set a whole new standard of evilness. Nixon's not in the same league at all. As John Dean said, while shaking his head, "On his worst day, Nixon would never have authorized torture."
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
7. palin's failings are a win for the USA. |
|
"It's an unpleasant chapter in my life," Donatelli told me when I asked about working for Palin. "I've been hurt in this whole process, I'm trying hard not to get into it."
Trying to muster up some sympathy for this republicon tool but this is all I got..:nopity:
palin's staff wasn't on it when she called fauxsnooze "lamestream"(she wasn't aware that faux was the station she was talking about) when she was babbling to hannity.
That last line the article.."she's not a conventional politician"..She's a conventional sociopath..run of the mill motormouth..lies pouring out at a rapid rabid rate.
On "The Good Wife" CBS April 6, 2010..a character called palin the devil incarnate..can't argue with that.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. LOL. Yep. One lone fiddle singing a real sad tune is about all we can |
|
put together for the poor dear.
If staff sign on to something as volatile and vacuous as Sarah Palin, they really do get what they pay for.
Good to see ya, Cha.
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Reading that underscores that Palin would be incapable of |
|
running the WH or anything else - she's not qualified to be its head butler.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
14. I could casually agree with you, treestar, but I think you aren't |
|
exaggerating one bit, so I'm going to agree with you whole-hog with trumpets.
The woman is a dingbat.
|
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-29-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Shocked. I am shocked I tell you/
|
Orsino
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Petty, entitled know-nothings hire other petty know-nothings. |
|
Such a brittle organization crumbles easily, and requires an incredible amount of hand-feeding by the MSM.
|
saltpoint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-30-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Agree. She's good for the junk news ratings, but her circus |
|
is about to run away from itself.
It is very difficult to imagine a more clueless figure than Sarah Palin.
|
zulchzulu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-30-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Palin is the "Little River Band" in a world of kickass rock and roll n/t |
pundaint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-01-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. The Little River Band does not deserve that. They may not be to your taste but they do no harm. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |