Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Florida House debating LIVE whether women must have an ultrasound before having an abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:51 AM
Original message
Florida House debating LIVE whether women must have an ultrasound before having an abortion
http://streams.leg.state.fl.us/stations/MBR/UNI/stream2.asx

April 30, 2010
Abortion up in House; Cretul asks pages to leave

The debate in the House has begun on whether to require most women to receive and pay for an ultrasound before having an abortion. As the questions began getting into the details of various procedures, Speaker Larry Cretul asked that the pages be excused from the chamber: "We are getting into some questions you might be sensitive to."
Posted by Lee Logan at 08:43:

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2010/04/abortion-up-in-house-cretul-asks-pages-to-leave.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can we demand a brain scan of the legislators
Just to see if there is any neuron activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Guess this the Republican party's 'less government' philosophy in action.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
14. No neuron activity there. However, there's a shitload of moron activity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katmondoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have my Florida licence plate that says CHOICE
but they don't know it, it's in Polish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Awesome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Would this doctor lie to us and say an ultrasound is required before performing an abortion?
He wouldn't lie to us, would he?

I am ashamed to be a Floridian. A woman just said the woman having the abortion can refuse to see the ultrasound. Right. And, who's going to pay for this ultrasound?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let me guess....most of the people having this debate are men?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes, altho there was one Hispanic woman speaking in favor and exaggerating number of those who've
contacted her expressing support for requiring this procedure before an abortion. I have no doubt she was exaggerating the numbers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. And, it's all done under the disingenuous guise of 'protecting' women-keeping them safe.
A Republican woman just repeated this 'protecting' meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. Got distracted. So, can a woman opt out of having an ultrasound or not. What's going on here?
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 08:23 AM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. So how many women are there to support this?
I briefly watched and all I saw are a bunch of men. Go figure ASSHOLES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. There are Republican women both supporting and opposing this bill. Don't know the numbers though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sentinel blog: House debating what could produce one of the toughest anti-abortion bills in the US

TALLAHASSEE — The Florida House began the final day of the session by delving into a fight that could produce one of the toughest anti-abortion bills in the country, a debate over requiring women to pay for ultrasounds that has reducing the Legislature’s work-pace to a crawl.

Rep. Scott Randolph, D-Orlando, began the questioning by trying to pepper House Republicans — the women selected by the GOP to handle the issue — with questions about the costs of the requirement that a first-trimester vaginal ultrasound be performed, as well as whether Medicaid would cover the costs.

Rep. Rachel Burgin, R-Brandon, a freshman and one of the youngest members of the House at 27-years-old, began fielding the questions — but then House Speaker Larry Cretul, R-Ocala, ordered the 13-year-old to 14-year-old legislative pages to leave the chamber, for fear of hearing the “sensitive” discussion.

After the move, Randolph dropped the line of interrogation, “since I’m not going to get an answer anyway.”

Other Democrats tried to press for answers on how the ultrasound costs might vary from rural to urban regions of the state.

“We are mandating a cost on someone,” said Rep. Richard Steinberg, D-Miami Beach. “I want to know, what is the cost of the procedure we are mandating on a woman who exercises her right to choose what to do with her body?”

The measure is also drawing some passionate debate from a few Republicans, including Rep. Ed Homan, a Tampa-area Republican and doctor, who challenged GOP backers about whether a woman getting an abortion had ever been denied the chance to view an ultrasound.

House Rules Chairman Bill Galvano, R-Bradenton, said he expected the measure to have broad support by the end of questioning and debate today. “There are many in this chamber who are very interested in that policy.”

The House is likely to spend hours on the bill, thanks to House Democrats’ decision to slow down the show yesterday. More on that here.

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/news_politics/2010/04/randolph-gets-sensitive-over-abortion-details.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+news%2Fpolitics%2Fpoliticalpulse+%28Central+Florida+Political+Pulse%29
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bear in mind these 'small government' Republican yahoos run our great state!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. It's not a mandate to require an ultrasound if abortion's an elective procedure?
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 08:55 AM by flpoljunkie
Yes, it is the same thing as the federal government mandating we buy health insurance.

Rep. Yolly Roberson, a black woman and a nurse, is asking the Republicans these very pertinent questions. She asked who will pay for this procedure for those who are uninsured in Florida?

http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Representatives/details.aspx?MemberId=4283

She is terrific!

These Republicans want to come between you and your doctor. Is this what you call 'less government,' Republicans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. They will make the women who want the abortion pay for it.
As typical of Rethugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. They sure as hell are!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Assholes...
...how about we stick a probe up their assholes looking for brain matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
19. Rep. Roberson says again this is an unfunded mandate and abortion decision should stay between woman
and her doctor and her partner.

Republicans are such 'limited government' hypocrites!

She's grea!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. They are against unfunded mandates when it is about the federal govt
But they are for unfunded mandates when it pertains to their issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
20. "Stand down if you don't have ovaries"
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 09:52 AM by KingFlorez
That's what one Representative (Janet Long) just said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Yes! Let's be honest here. This amendment is not to protect women, but to discourage abortion.
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 09:38 AM by flpoljunkie
Republicans are hypocrites. They do not really mean it when they say they want 'small government' and government to stay out of our business. If this is not major intrusion to someone's freedom to obtain a lawful procedure, I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Rep. Kriseman says exactly this and this amendment is being offered to repeal to the Republican base
Exactly right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puzzler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
22. All the pols in the house are doctors, right?
(sarcasm)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. Here we go again. Men deciding for women when it has to do with reproduction.
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 09:50 AM by political_Dem
Maybe it's time for women to decide for men to forcibly get a castration without anesthetic. If women did so, this anti-abortion talk would stop in a heartbeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Abortion would be a sacrament if men could get pregnant. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
27. Are there any other surgical procedures that the government mandates how they must be performed?


And for the pages being excused from the chamber during debate. If they think the subject is that sensitive then they shouldn't be discussing it!! And should not be legislating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. There are no laws which require an ultrasound before any other medical procedure.
Don't you get it? This is to 'PROTECT WOMEN!' And, certainly not to discourage women from having a perfectly legal medical procedure!

If this passes, we will be in the proud company of Alabama, Louisiana and Mississippi, Floridians!

These yahoos running our state must be voted out of office! We deserve better than this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. A Republican Dr. whose against this bill as an 'intrusion of government into practice of medicine.'
http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/SECTIONS/Representatives/details.aspx?MemberId=4275&SessionId=64

Representative Ed Homan is an orthopedic surgeon, who represents Hillsborough, Pasco counties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
30. Pure manipulation....
I think a women is well aware of what is happening in her uterus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Yep. Good point from Dem Rep. Rader that they're spending last day of session on this and not jobs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
31. Rep Stargel, this is not about disclosure, this is about discouraging women from having an abortion.
Let's be honest here. This is not about 'empowering women with information.' This is about discouraging women from having a perfectly legal medical procedure--which is not unrestricted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
33. How about a literacy test, instead?
Isn't that a cheaper way to keep second-class citizens in line?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
34. Machines locked for quorum call. Vote coming shortly. Bill expected to pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Bil passes 72 to 46. Now, will Crist veto, sign into law, or let become law w/o signature?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
36. The Florida Senate passed this ultrasound mandate for an abortion yesterday by a 26-13 vote.
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 10:49 AM by flpoljunkie
Bill forcing all abortion candidates to get ultrasound expected to pass House, go to governor

By DARA KAM
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer

Posted: 10:07 p.m. Thursday, April 29, 2010

Legislation that would require any woman seeking an abortion in Florida to have an ultrasound and listen to a medical professional's detailed description of the fetus is expected to pass the House and go to the governor Friday, the final day of the session.

House Democrats took a stand Thursday against the anti-abortion measure, temporarily halting other business in the Republican-dominated chamber, but the procedural method they used doesn't apply to the measure and they lack the numbers to prevent the vote Friday.

The Senate approved the bill by a 26-13 vote Thursday afternoon after an hour of emotional debate from both sides.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/state/bill-forcing-all-abortion-candidates-to-get-ultrasound-647863.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Yet more evidence that Florida is beyond the reach of democracy. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
37. SPT Buzz blog comments on the passage of this bill...
April 30, 2010

House spends final day on abortion with eye toward Crist

A more than three-hour House debate about an ultrasound bill dissolved into a heated discussion about abortion, as tempers flared and lawmakers warned visitors and young staff to leave the chamber.

It's a remarkable scene on the final day of the legislative session that leaves palatable divisions among Republican and Democratic lawmakers ahead of an election year and ends House Speaker Larry Cretul's tenure on a sour note. The 72-46 mostly party line vote to add the abortion language to a broad health care bill was expected since the debate first began at 8:28 a.m. but it didn't stop the political theater as Republicans used procedural moves to block all amendments and put time limits on debate.

The real decision comes to Gov. Charlie Crist, who has vacillated on the issue in the past but now looks at it through the lens of his nonpartisan bid for the U.S. Senate.

"I want to have that independent governor to think about that the people want ... and veto this bill," pleaded Rep. Richard Steinberg, D-Miami Beach.

But a former Crist supporter, Rep. Chris Dorworth, a Lake Mary Republican, countered: "If he vetoes this bill, he's saying the millions of babies who will be terminated from this are not people. I know he's a man of character and he won't do that."

http://blogs.tampabay.com/buzz/2010/04/house-spends-final-day-on-abortion-with-eye-toward-crist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
38. Postonpolitics: Charlie Crist has 'concerns' over the abortion bill just passed
Crist has ‘concerns’ over abortion bill, will head to Pensacola to monitor oil spill

by Michael C. Bender
April 30th, 2010

Few people understand nuance better than Gov. Charlie Crist, but after four years we’ve learned that “concern” from the governor about a piece of legislation can often quickly lead to a veto.

Here’s what he told The Palm Beach Post, the only media outlet to talk with Crist about the bill so far today.

“I just saw the House passed it a few minutes ago,” Crist said. “Obviously we haven’t had a chance to review it in our office. But it gives me concern. Sure.”

Asked what about the proposal concerns him, Crist said, “I need to study it.”

Crist was equally serene when asked about the budget. Crist was the target of some choice words from lawmakers when he proposed a $69.2 billion spending plan. The final budget from lawmakers: $70.4 billion.

Crist has been asked several times about a potential veto of the budget, but has steered those questions toward his traditional action on the budget, which has been to veto specific line items and not the entire document.

He did the same today.

“I think what I need to do is let Jerry (McDaniel, Crist’s budget director) and his team look through it very thoughtfully and thoroughly,” Crist said. “Once they’ve had that opportunity, then I go ahead and begin getting briefed by him and his team. I want to be very methodical about it, you know, what’s in there what maybe shouldn’t be in there and do the right thing.”

Crist said he planned head to Pensacola this weekend to monitor the disastrous oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Crist said the spill “puts the kibosh” on any more talk of expanded oil drilling in the Gulf.

“How anybody could see that and not think that not only do you need to rethink it, but certainly put all the breaks on it,” Crist said. “That’s the only right thing to do.”

http://www.postonpolitics.com/2010/04/crist-has-concerns-over-abortion-bill-will-head-to-pensacola-to-monitor-oil-spill/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. He's lining things up for a veto.
He's got a lot less to lose now that he's moved into the NPA category.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC