Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Questions About Halliburton's Role in the Explosion of the Deepwater Horizon Rig in the Gulf

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 05:24 PM
Original message
NYT: Questions About Halliburton's Role in the Explosion of the Deepwater Horizon Rig in the Gulf
4:14 P.M. Questions About Halliburton’s Role

“If unchecked, it will take about 50 days for the leak to eclipse the 1989 Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, the worst U.S. oil spill on record that sent 10.8 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound,” Reuters explains. The news agency adds: “Shares of companies that provided services or operated the sunken Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, including Halliburton and Transocean, fell sharply as worry mounted about liability from the spill.”

What role did Halliburton play in the operation of the rig that exploded last week, setting off the spill? Russell Gold and Ben Casselman of The Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday:

An oil-drilling procedure called cementing is coming under scrutiny as a possible cause of the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico that has led to one of the biggest oil spills in U.S. history, drilling experts said Thursday.

The process is supposed to prevent oil and natural gas from escaping by filling gaps between the outside of the well pipe and the inside of the hole bored into the ocean floor. Cement, pumped down the well from the drilling rig, is also used to plug wells after they have been abandoned or when drilling has finished but production hasn’t begun.

In the case of the Deepwater Horizon, workers had finished pumping cement to fill the space between the pipe and the sides of the hole and had begun temporarily plugging the well with cement; it isn’t known whether they had completed the plugging process before the blast. <...>

The scrutiny on cementing will focus attention on Halliburton Co., the oilfield-services firm that was handling the cementing process on the rig, which burned and sank last week. <...>

According to Transocean Ltd., the operator of the drilling rig, Halliburton had finished cementing the 18,000-foot well shortly before the explosion. <...>

The timing of the cementing in relation to the blast—and the procedure’s history of causing problems—point to it as a possible culprit in the Deepwater Horizon disaster, experts said.

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/04/30/updates-on-the-oil-slick-in-the-gulf-of-mexico/?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I see lawyers
Hordes of lawyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do seriously believe Halliburton lawyers are going to role up their sleeves....
and help clean-up the oil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope that it wasn't sabotage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chollybocker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-10 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. OMG!
Edited on Fri Apr-30-10 07:56 PM by chollybocker
As the diner said to the waiter, "The shrimp are revolting."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC