Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With 59 Democratic senators, shouldn't we get a REAL liberal for the SCOTUS?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:48 PM
Original message
With 59 Democratic senators, shouldn't we get a REAL liberal for the SCOTUS?
I was looking at senate.gov, George HW Bush was able to replace Thurgood Marshall (liberal) with arguably the most conservative idealogue ever in Clarence Thomas....And Democrats controlled the senate in 1991, (11 Democrats for some inexplicable reason voted for him)..
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=102&session=1&vote=00220

Could you imagine if Reagan or Bush 1 or 2 had 59 Rethugs in the senate?...

Sorry, but of the names being talked about most thus far to replace Justice Stevens (Kagan, Garland, S. Thomas) these are moderates...

Here's still hoping (or is it wishful thinking?) for a REAL liberal appt (Diane Wood, Pamela Karlan, Harold Koh, couple others), this is probably the last, best chance to excite the base before the Nov. elections..



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I sent an email to the Whitehouse
asking that a LIBERAL judge be nominated for the court. What else can we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Cue some to attack you for suggesting a liberal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Cue some snarky troublemaker trying to induce flames
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Thems' fightin' words.
:+

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think so. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. As we are all becoming painfully aware,... Democrat does not = Liberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
42. I Hear Ya (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. lol conservatives usually appoint...ta da...conservatives nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Of course. It's unreal that we even have to make this argument. nt
Edited on Sat May-01-10 01:15 PM by Smarmie Doofus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. AGREE! Liberal as in minimum government and maximum individual freedom. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue_onyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Obama is a moderate
Why are people shocked that most of the candidates mentioned are moderates?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, President Obama is definitely a moderate,
but i thought he might just go liberal on SCOTUS appointments, especially after the awful Citizens United ruling...

Please Mr. President just this once, do something REALLY left of center, give the left our Scalia...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Carter and Clinton could both be classified as moderates
but Clinton's USSC appointees were both pretty liberal (albeit not as liberal as some made by previous Democratic presidents), and many of the most liberal members of the federal courts were appointed by Carter. I'm personally not shocked that Obama may not be considering particularly liberal candidates for the courts, but I also don't think doing so would be that odd, considering the records of previous "moderate" Democratic presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnypneumatic Donating Member (461 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. only a few of the 59 are liberals
and Obama isn't a liberal either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. Obama seems to have made the pick of the conservative Kagan
how in the hell he can pick her, when she is definitely conservative. When there is no way she could cajole people into the left's point of view the way the justice she would be replacing. And I don't think she would even try.

It seems that Obama is doing his best to please the republicans in every thing he does. Look at the cuts in the health care bill he urges. Look at what he urged in the wall street and big bank bill. Is he republican or is he the democrat we all voted for. I am beginning to wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Face it: we were punked.
We all *KNEW* he was no liberal, but he's turned out to be
much worse than most of us imagined. He's not just ignored
the left, he's actively worked *AGAINST* our positions in many
of his actions and appointments.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 03:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. "much worse than most of us imagined". What an utter crock of shit.
Edited on Sun May-02-10 03:38 AM by Tarheel_Dem
You don't speak for me, and I don't think you speak for "most" on the left. I think this president hates ideologues nearly as much as I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. And dont forget the appeasing to the right with the Baffling Offshore Drilling BEFORE negotiating...
He is certainly no liberal and me thinks the meaning of left is somewhere way right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
40. She clerked for Thurgood Marshall.
Edited on Sun May-02-10 09:16 PM by geek tragedy
Highly unlikely that she is a conservative. The rest of your post is premature whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. For that you would need a liberal president. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Where are the 59 liberals in the Senate? We have about 15.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. "Me too!" Several in this thread have made this point.
Electing Obama didn't turn all of the Senate into Bernie Sanders.... it didn't even turn Obama into Bernie Sanders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. You're equating "Democrat"—in the party-wide sense—with "liberal". And haven't we all
seen more than enough to know that that is far from the case?

Yes, I wish we would get a genuine progressive liberal on the court. I ain't holding my breath. Obama will probably want to make sure the Republicans are okay with his choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. Obama will always, ALWAYS look to please the Right--so NO CHANCE for a Liberal (or even slight-left)
We've seen this too often...Obama consistently looks to please the right in every decision he makes such as the diastrous offshore drilling before even negotiating despite his talk to the left of not doing it in the campaign. He will msot certainly choose a conservative....no question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. What do you think of Obama's Sotomayor pick?
Do you think she is too moderate and not liberal enough? What decisions has she made that you disagree with?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I think the Sotomayor pick was good,
but he has a GOLDEN opportunity to keep some needed balance on the SCOTUS w/the Stevens replacement pick...

He may not get a chance to make another appointment to the high court, even if he wins (and i think he will) another term...President Clinton got to make 2 SCOTUS appointments in his first two years, then there wasn't an opening for over a decade (until Renquist died in 2005)...

Sorry to keep harping on it, but just imagine who a Republican president would put on the court with a 59-41 majority..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. just like we should have gotten healthcare reform?
yeah right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. moderate is a misnomer for corporate stooges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think it's funny how people are so eager to bitch at Obama, they can't even wait for him
to make his decision.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Or, per some here, he HAS made his decision already.
They just know it already or something...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. And they KNOW that Kagan is really just like Roberts and Alito.
Such geniuses amongst us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, one can hope,
but I think we first need a liberal President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last_texas_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. And Thomas would've received many more Democratic votes if not for the Anita Hill scandal
Compare that to the Repugs, who managed to rally 31 votes to oppose the center-left Sotomayor, on the grounds that she once dared to utter the phrase "wise Latina."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greencharlie Donating Member (827 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. I LIKE Kagan... a lot. But not on SCOTUS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. Are you privy to information no one else has? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
29. Bush didn't need 59 Republicans
to appoint two of the most far right justices the country has ever seen...

Which doesn't bode well for the appointment of a liberal to replace Stevens.

That would actually take some political courage from the Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yes, I emailed the WH as well, stating that it is beyond time to
give a little to the left who actually voted for Obama rather than continue to give concessions to the right who hate him. Repeal DADT, send a REAL LIBERAL to the Court and maybe we can get some more liberals to vote in November. Otherwise, it may be a hard sell...and we really do not need any more republicans in American government, period.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
33. You'd think, but with 59 Democratic senators I was expecting a REAL health care plan.
We got the shitty Republican one instead and now we hall have to buy insurance while the IRS adds thousands of agents to ensure compliance in Operation Enrich Insurance Companies.

I'm not expecting a Scalia from Obama, but I'm not expecting an actual liberal either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistler162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
36. Real Liberal or real Liberal until they do something
that isn't within your agenda?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. When we have 59 "real liberal" senators
and a dozen or so more just plain Democrats, then you can get a REAL liberal. What you have is about 20 real liberals, 32 liberal leaners, and 7 blue dog center to center-right types. At one point in the FDR administration the Dems held 84 seats. Do that and now you are talking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawaii Hiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. 84 seats??
Edited on Sun May-02-10 08:07 PM by Hawaii Hiker
Shit, it was hard as hell to get 60..Specter switched parties, Franken won the close MN. race, Begich won in ultra-red Alaska, and we would need 24 more, lol....

You're right, there probably are only about 20 REAL liberal senators, & several blue dog types, but still, we should be able to confirm a very liberal justice....All we need is 50 plus Joe Biden (as he breaks the ties as President of the Senate)...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #37
43. the largest number of Democratic senators during FDR's presidency was 76 and
a lot of those were very conservative southern Democrats.

I don't know where you pulled that "84" number from. The Democratic majorities in the Senate during FDR's presidency were:

1932 60
1934 69
1936 76
1938 69
1940 66
1942 58
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
39. We might if we had a REAL liberal in the WH. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC