Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Far-Right Media Push 'Sabotage' Conspiracy Theory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:09 PM
Original message
Far-Right Media Push 'Sabotage' Conspiracy Theory
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_05/023626.php

FAR-RIGHT MEDIA PUSH 'SABOTAGE' CONSPIRACY THEORY.... Paul Krugman warned us last week, explaining that conservatives would come up with some creative arguments to blame the BP oil spill disaster in the Gulf on President Obama, his allies, or both.

Rush Limbaugh did his part on Thursday, suggesting that explosion aboard the explosion on the Deepwater Horizon oil rig may have had something to do with "hardcore environmentalist whackos" and the timing of Senate movement on a cap-and-trade bill.

Fox News, specifically "Fox & Friends," took the crazy ball and ran with it this morning, suggesting that sabotage and politics may have been involved. Based on what, exactly? A combination of blind partisanship, overactive imaginations, and conspicuous unintelligence.

Perino: "{W}as this deliberate?" On the May 3 broadcast of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Fox News contributor Dana Perino said of the spill: "I'm not trying to introduce a conspiracy theory, but was this deliberate? You have to wonder...if there was sabotage involved."

Bolling falsely claimed it was "nine days before" the leak "was even addressed" and asked, "Did they let this thing leak? ... if they're going to try and pull drilling, that may be the way they do it." On the same broadcast of Fox & Friends, Fox Business Network host Eric Bolling said: "The question is ... why the delay in the response? You guys were pointing out, nine days before it was even addressed, 12 days before he made a formal comment. The question is, did they let this thing leak? I mean, BP said maybe a thousand barrels a day, it went to five thousand. Did they let it leak a little bit and say, boy I don't know. The conspiracy theorists would say, 'maybe they'd let it leak for a while, and then they addressed the issue.'" Bolling added: "That would be a humongous accusation and probably the net result would be no different, but if they're going to try and pull drilling, that may be the way they do it."
:crazy:

I'm trying to decide which of the two bizarre media personalities was dumber. Bolling seems to have the edge.

Perino's comments were, to be sure, entertaining. In one breath, she's not "trying to introduce a conspiracy theory," and in the next breath, viewers "have to wonder" if her baseless conspiracy theory is true.

But Bolling enjoys the edge because his "analysis" (I use the word loosely) combines several layers of stupidity. Not only was he carelessly throwing around insane speculation about events he doesn't understand, but Bollling tops it off by asking why there was a "delay in the response," when in Grown-Up Land, there was no delay in the response.

Of course, GOP conspiracy theories, no matter how insane, don't have to make sense; they don't have to withstand scrutiny; they don't even have to be persuasive. They just have to be repeated. In this case, we see pure nonsense start on Limbaugh's show, and then work their way to Fox News. One can only assume other Republican outlets, assuming they cover the oil spill at all, will soon start reporting that "some say" politically-motivated sabotage may have been involved.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Corporations never make mistakes in their (small) minds
It cant be anything but sabotage, otherwise their corporate religion has to be questioned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Anybody that can believe that environmentalist
could find a way to go 5000 feet or more down into the ocean and blow the well has got to have screw loose and the people listening that accept that are worst. That's the problem with capping the well, getting down to the problem. And these people have sophisticated equipment made for such problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brother Buzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I heard one bombastic meme: The environmentalist hooked up with the North Koreans
and fired a torpedo from a North Korean submarine. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. or that an environmentalist would destroy the ocean to save it.
This is an epic disaster, nothing more.

We need to call these speculations "CRAZY CONSPIRACY THEORIES" because that's what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. There was a caller on the Diane Rehm show, who presented just such a theory.
I had a feeling I knew where she was coming from, but this confirms it. The rightwing has received their latest Frank Luntz marching orders, and they're spreading the word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gawd! These people are too stupid to live!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Politics is blood and guts win at any cost WAR to these low lifes--nothing is beneath them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. They're too stupid to
feed themselves..that's for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. sounds like they 're saying "they" let it leak awhile..
sorta like GWB during Katrina, I guess. NOT. Yeah we're gonna get someone to destroy our Gulf to prove a point. FOX IS terror terror terror alla time, still, btw. They make money by scaring the hell out of their viewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
political_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. The RW is using their propaganda arm of their party to build the case
Edited on Mon May-03-10 04:38 PM by political_Dem
of Mr. Obama's ineffectuality as a leader--especially when they go out on a ledge and blame BP's massive blunder on the man.

What is worse is that people who already are taken in by the talking points of the POTUS' "illegitimacy in terms of birth or election" or his "socialist/communist" leanings will now harp on his lack of "leadership" ability due to the constant repetition of the meme, "Obama's Katrina".

So, it's not really a stretch for the easily led army of cynical Republicans, angry faux-independents and boorish Tea baggers to believe and continue to perpetuate this lie as well. Like preparing a field for planting, these true believers of the GOP will use word of mouth in order to spread the manure their handlers will give them.

In short, this type of slander is the Republican way of playing telephone--except the message becomes more and more corrosive each time it passes from person to person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. What's the big deal, Halliburton has always been eco-terrorist.
Terrorism on our ecology is part of their business model. They are very successful at it too (well, as long as they hold positions in government and the contracts are no-bid).

(IOW If they want to go there turn it back on them.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobburgster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. What a joke!
There's a few of them going around...not to mention the ever present bombastic idiot, King Rush Limbaugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, sure, sabotage by Haliburton maybe.
And why are they defending that foreign oil company, BP? Don't they realized that the BP originally stood for British Petroleum? Hey, maybe this is a European plot to undermine the American South!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. And the stupid train choogles along . . . So, riddle me this Batman
why would Obama or anyone in his administration sabotage an off-shore oil well just weeks after deciding to allow more off-shore oil drilling? Anyone? Bueller?

This "theory" is laughably stupid on so many levels, but this is the most obvious question/problem with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. They don't 'have' to make sense, and this is just more proof.
Remember who they're 'talking' to, low-info people who believe whatever they say is gospel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah, Bill Maher mentioned it Friday night ...
a band of underwater (dirty) hippies would be blamed for taking out the oil rig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yeah, us tree huggers spilled the oil! That makes no sense.
Why would environmentalists want to kill wildlife and pollute the oceans and shorelines?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC