Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Narrative Bites The Dust

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:15 PM
Original message
Another Narrative Bites The Dust
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_05/023714.php

ANOTHER NARRATIVE BITES THE DUST.... For several days, the national media seemed heavily invested in characterizing the BP oil spill disaster as "Obama's Katrina." Major, mainstream outlets -- not just Limbaugh and Fox News -- "concocted the absurd 'Obama's Katrina' claim in the first place, and then helped actively push it. Journalists did it by pointing to mostly faceless, imaginary 'critics' of the Obama administration in order to float the phony storyline."

But it didn't take.
It may have had something to do with the intervention of other world events -- the attempted terrorism in Times Square, the European debt crisis, the British elections -- but vague criticism of the administration's response to the Gulf was relatively short-lived. Even conservatives found it easily dismissible.

When House Republican Conference Chairman Mike Pence (R-Ind.) held a press conference to blast the president's handling of the issue mid-week, he couldn't explain why he was unsatisfied, and most of the political world found it best to just blow off his shallow nonsense.

While the oil spill disaster remains an ongoing crisis -- indeed, oil continues to gush into the Gulf as I type -- the questions surrounding the speed of the Obama administration's response seem to have been answered. To the wire service's credit, the AP's H. Josef Hebert and Erica Werner published a lengthy report this morning on the "aggressive" federal response to the disaster.

The Gulf region, ravaged five years earlier by Hurricane Katrina, was on the verge of a second ecological disaster. Would there be a repeat of the bureaucratic bungling that marked President George W. Bush's response to the hurricane?

While the Obama administration has faced second-guessing about the speed and effectiveness of some of its actions, a narrative pieced together by The Associated Press, based on documents, interviews and public statements, shows little resemblance to Katrina in either the characterization of the threat or the federal government's response.


Reading the detailed piece, it's hard to imagine how the administration's response, given the information available, could have been better. That's cold comfort given the severity of the huge oil spill and the ecological, economic, and environmental consequences. No matter how efficient and thorough the administration's response, the disaster is no less a disaster. Taking the White House off the to-be-blamed list isn't as important as the ongoing effort to deal with the crisis itself.

Nevertheless, the political drive to blame President Obama for a sluggish response looks increasingly ridiculous.

The White House's detractors will have to find something else to obsess over. The Katrina comparison, comically flawed when it was first raised, has been proven baseless.

-Steve Benen

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iGw5j_drnBauWXcnC9-obnID4GNAD9FILHSG0
Obama oil response: aggressive as crisis unfolded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. That meme was one of the Right's more lame efforts. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I knew the second it happened that this would be the Limbaugh-Hannity spin.
They are such predictabe A-holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Obama has a heart. Bush didn't have one. That is the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's practice. They'll dust it off and use it again during the next disaster. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grey Donating Member (933 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Do you mean Cheney's Chernobyl?
Cheney's Chernobyl

By Michael J.W. Stickings

Thank you, Skippy.

And spread the word, people. It's not Obama's Katrina, it's Cheney's Chernobyl.

How so? Check out William Galston at TNR (read it all -- it's important):

First, an oil-drilling procedure called cementing -- which is supposed to prevent oil and natural gas from escaping by filling gaps between the outside of the well pipe and the inside of the hole bored into the ocean floor -- has been identified as a leading cause of well blowouts. Indeed, a 2007 study by the Minerals Management Service (or MMS, the division of the Interior Department responsible for offshore drilling) found that this procedure was implicated in 18 out of 39 blowouts in the Gulf of Mexico over the 14 years it studied -- more than any other factor. Cementing, which was handled by Halliburton, had just been completed prior to the recent explosion. The Journal notes that Halliburton was also the cementer on a well that suffered a big blowout last August in the Timor Sea off Australia. While BP's management has been responsive to press inquiries and relatively forthcoming as to its responsibility, Halliburton has refused to answer any questions -- an all-too-familiar stance on its part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That, and calling the spill 'Lake Palin' are great. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. This Country will not be Right until this man is in jail for the rest of hils
miserable life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. A more apt comparison would be how Obama responded to the flood in TN,
which I understand was very good.

I flipped through CNN the other night & noticed that there was an 800 number for FEMA for folks to call. I don't recall that during Katrina.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Napolitano was on the news and said that FEMA and the gov
were going to help the best they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think we should keep using it ourselves....
Bush's Katrina: Colossal Cluster-fuck
Obama's Katrina: Competent Response

Note: Only DU would the word "cluster-fuck" actually appear in the Spell Check!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Some people here should learn that lesson themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama's Int Dept exempted this BP project from Env Impact Study; if the study
had been conducted, as required, this catastrophe would not have happened

in many ways, therefore, it's worse; at least Katrina, as horrific as it was, was due to longstanding army corps levy failures and natural storms; this BP catastrophe was due to detestable behavior
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. When one's mantra throughout an election season is "Drill, Baby, Drill"......
when an oil spill happens precisely due to Drilling,
it is best to STFU and lay low.....otherwise,
one starts looking quite insane blaming the one
who has been quite resistant to the idea until very recently,
and then only in order to sway the "drill, Baby, drill" folks to support
legislation pushing a much wider array of solutions to our
energy problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-08-10 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Right admits Katrina was Bush's downfall.....
That's what I find interesting about this attempt to smear Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. That was my first thought too
By calling this horrible disaster comparable to katrina, the repubs were admitting that bushco failed in his handling of katrina.

kinda makes it harder for them to defend bushco after saying that...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Conservatives use the "you're just as bad" defense.....
quite a bit, not seeming to realize what they are saying about themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-09-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
17. Agree. They tried awful awful hard to make the BP disaster "Obama's
Katrina" and it was a no-go.

Benen is right.

It's interesting that if they were targeting Obama for embarrassment by calling the Gulf disaster "Obama's Katrina," they are tacitly acknowledging that George W. Bush abandoned his responsibilities when Katrina struck.

Unfortunately for the rightwing kooks out there, the Obama administration has been dutiful in its response to the BP event and the Tennessee flooding. The same could not have been said for the Bush administration when Katrina came ashore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC