KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:44 AM
Original message |
I understand being a"consensus builder" is nice but this person will rule for at least 25 years!!!!! |
|
I really wish we would have the balls to try a "Roberts" type person like Bush did!!!
I hated Bush but he had the dedication to his cause to push it when he thought it helped his agenda!!!
|
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It amazes me that some "liberals" admire the Bush way |
|
look at where we are now after 8 years of the Bush-Cheney-Rove method of leadership.
|
KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. He got what his party wanted. Enough said! |
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. and now his party and him are a laughing stock |
|
and they ruined the economy, placed us in 2 wars, exploded our debt, doled out cash to the rich etc.
But lets emulate Bush for short term political gain.
|
T Wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Do you mean short-term political gains like supporting workers instead of corporations, supporting |
|
Edited on Mon May-10-10 10:00 AM by T Wolf
environmental protection instead of defending the polluters, protecting civil liberties instead of destroying them, etc.? These kinds of "political" gains I can live with, no matter how they are achieved.
|
KansasVoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. And Roberts will rul for 20 more years! Was that a failure also??? |
Moochy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
9. False equivalence : all users of partisan tactics don't have the same goals |
|
We had Better do the opposite of what Bush did except when it comes to accountability, or ending the gravy train to the M.I.C.
|
Jennicut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Dedication? Bush was never in charge. He did what others told him to do. |
|
Bush was along for the ride.
|
woolldog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
3. She doesn't look like a fit and healthy 50 yo to me |
|
Unclear she'll be on the court that long
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Now, you want an Alito type person |
|
Roberts is more like Sotamayor. He flew under the radar.
|
jefferson_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
8. This person will not rule anything. |
|
She would be one vote among nine. If you don't understand how "consensus building" on the court matters, I encourage you to seek out a book called "The Brethren" by Woodward. Politics at play on the Supreme Cout, behind closed doors? F'yeah!
|
hedgehog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Aren't most Supreme Court decsions binary? If it comes to an |
|
up or down vote on any issue, it really doesn't matter how liberal she is as long as she votes the right way. It's better to have someone who votes the right way and can get others to vote with her than to get a get speechmaker who always loses.
|
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon May-10-10 10:19 AM
Response to Original message |
12. The nature of the consensus matters. n/t |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message |