Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh Good God... Does the RNC really want to say the Constitution was not originally defective?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:00 AM
Original message
Oh Good God... Does the RNC really want to say the Constitution was not originally defective?
Do they really want to suggest that the Founders were right to not count slaves as people?

Do they really want to suggest that? I really hope they do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ironically, it was the Northern States that wanted the 3/5 fraction to count slaves
Edited on Mon May-10-10 11:23 AM by no_hypocrisy
to prevent the Southern States from having a majority in the House of Representatives by a Census, to prevent the South from have "too much power" in Congress.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-fifths_compromise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. The original had no Bill of Rights, either.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Steele is the gift who keeps on giving...
dontcha think?
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Constitution was flawed from the outset and is still flawed..
I don't know if I'd call it defective, necessarily, but flawed, it remains.

Congress requires the power to define and limit non-person citizens, viz. corporations. The Constitution does not give it such power. We have no Constitutional right to vote or to justice or to even free thought, let alone privacy. A right to bear arms - which should be protected - must not be interpreted as license to own weapons of mass destruction. The Constitution should limit the gamesmanship which may be practiced by the upper House of Congress, specifically "secret holds" and anonymous earmarks. The Supreme Court holds the ultimate power of interpreting the Constitution itself and has zero accountability to the people. And there are many people who have other objections, some of them actually reasonable.

It is the greatest document of its kind ever produced, but it still needs work. We as Americans should never forget it, and I submit we, the current citizens of America, should actively seek to correct the flaws we detect in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. So Michael Steele is fine with being 3/5 of a human being?
Who's going to be the other 2/5 RNC chairman then?

Maybe Ann Coulter? Her anorexia makes her about 2/5 human, and her sick mentality arguably even less so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC