Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unless there is something scandalous, Kagen is in. Filibuster looks impossible.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:06 PM
Original message
Unless there is something scandalous, Kagen is in. Filibuster looks impossible.
They might vote against her in the final vote, but Richard Lugar, Judd Gregg, and the Maine chicks are not going to filibuster a Supreme Court nominee. Neither will Voinivich, of Ohio, and probably not Bond, of Missouri. They are all on record as not believing in deference to the president. Lindsey Graham will also vote for her, no doubt.

There is no path to 41 here for the Republican's. I think Scott Brown will also vote for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good News
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrToast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. She needs one Republican to get out of Committee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I wonder if Obama could recess appoint her?
Not that it is a good idea but is this allowed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. You don't need one Republican vote. I used to think the same thing.
Unless they changed the rules since Alito. The Dems in committee did not vote for Alito.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/nominations/SupremeCourt/CommitteeVotes.cfm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. ?"They are all on record as not believing in deference to the president":
I thought they believe in deference to the Presidents' choices for the SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "not" doesn't belong
I think....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC