Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Obama is beyond livid at British Petroleum"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:02 PM
Original message
"Obama is beyond livid at British Petroleum"
Obama is said to be beyond livid at British Petroleum and by his government's own inability to contain and mitigate what he realizes is an environmental catastrophe of near un-imaginable proportions. Says an official: "It gnaws at him." If you want to get as angry as POTUS, read this series of articles by Brentin Mock of TheLensNola. Problem is: there's really not much the administration can do, because its technical capacity is limited. The tragedy is that big. In the near term, expect more money and more people. Note: Rep. Henry Waxman hinted that MSNBC tonight that BP "may not survive" the combined financial/PR crisis that has resulted. ... The administration sent a letter to the Hill tonight asking for an oil spill supplemental, which would make more money available more quickly.

http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/10/05/the-night-beat-a-new-york-welcome-for-obama/56639


I'm fairly certain that a pissed off Barack Obama is something I'd rather not ever have to see.

Related, "Obama proposes larger oil cleanup fund, tax on oil companies"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=433x297258
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm fairly certain that a pissed off Barack Obama...
Edited on Wed May-12-10 09:08 PM by Atman
...will prove to be impotent against the myriad petro lawyers who are figuring out ways to limit their financial exposure and stick the United States taxpayers with the tab for this most horrific of un-natural disasters. This rig is flagged in the Marshall Islands, owned by a British company, operated by a Swedish company, pumping the United States' oil while subsidized by American taxpayers.

President Obama...how about "Executive Order" time and shut this fucking nonsense down all together, before BP simply declares bankruptcy and tells us to go fuck ourselves? Please?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Perhaps he'll smack them down with a sternly worded letter
and government funds to help with the cleanup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Executive orders are limited.
They aren't "orders issued by the executive branch for the country." They are orders issued by the chief executive for the executive branch under his authority.

As such, they have to abide by the law. The ones that don't tend to be understandably not law-abiding: The continuation of authority order, signed by each president since at least Kennedy, oversteps its bounds quite a bit but only comes into effect if a disaster wipes out sufficient of Congress and the judiciary that the Constitutional authorities can't function.

Otherwise they simply state regulations and policies on how to do things, where the law is silent and the only people involved are his employees. "Shut down BP" would require a basis in law, one that's not there. "This is how we deal with classified information" is under Obama's jurisdiction--both because of legislation, and because of that "we".

Then again, we could just have Obama shred the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good. I want to see what he's like when he's livid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Me too. I will bet he can get pissed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Are those Crunchy Frog babies?
If so, congrats! They are totally adorable!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thank you. Yours are too.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. if BP was gay he would study them for a year before doing anything about it lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you sure do have a one-track mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Being forced to wait for equality--something most people already enjoy--is difficult.
Compassion, consideration, and understanding from those who aren't being discriminated against helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Awesome post, but I doubt people who don't already understand this care. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Ever try to understand why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. No.
All that matters is that someone is insufficiently enthusiastic about a politician aramchek has made into some sort of fantasy best friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. He should be "beyond livid" at Salazar as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Salazar and ALL the Bush holdovers. All should be canned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
29. Salazar is not a Bush hold-over
And he has a 81% lifetime rating from the League of Conservation Voters, which means that he's not perfect, but he's a damned sight better than many of his predecessors.

I'll agree that the MMS needs to be "burned to the ground" and started over again. That's pretty much what's been proposed. The new MMS will have two divisions -- one for writing permits and one for safety and environmental enforcement. The enforcement people will be separate from the permitting people, and they'll have the power to effectively veto any permits if the driller can't meet safety standards.

The toxic atmosphere in the MSS is something that has been known for years -- dating back before Bush and even before Clinton. Salazar had initiated an agency review some months back -- but certainly not in time to prevent this catastrophe.

I'll also agree that he should have moved faster -- from Day One -- to start a safety review of every operating rig. Should he be fired for that? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joe black Donating Member (514 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. Go tell that to a wolf.
Salazar seems to think it's ok to hunt them down and kill them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Oh please oh please oh please. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd be angry too I 'd just given my seal of approval and had something of this magnitude occur
On the one hand you've got regrets at the misstep(s)- and on the other, helplessness to do anything to stop the growing catastrophe.

I'd hate to be among the advisers who told him to make that move (or God forbid, failed to emphasize that a similar disaster happened just last year off West Australia).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. Oil doesn't mix with water OR government
Now would be a good time to break the oil habit this country has been all junked out on, President Obama.

The shift to non-oil-based energy cannot happen fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Imagine the speeches he's going to give about them!
I bet they are quaking in their boots!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. I'm glad. I hope he's saying in the background 'I want these assholes to go DOWN.' nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
14. So is drilling off the table now?
Or is this still a rare event? I'd like to hear his decision on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. No,. The Dems have proposed new subsidies for it.
Sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. NEVER Watch CNN Anymore, But MSNBC Just Quoted A Poll That SAID...
and hold onto your hat here because I DON'T understand this at all! It stated that SIXTY Per Cent of the American people STILL SUPPORT off-shore drilling!!

I live in an area that has touted many times in the past, THE WHITEST beaches in THE WORLD, here in Florida, and a place the environmentalist say it's not "IF" the spill will come ashore, but "WHEN!"

I'm just south of this area on the Gulf side and I've heard that some in Tampa are already beginning to "smell that smell!" We are south of Tampa, but only an hour away!

What DON'T those 60%'ers get or understand??? I say, come on down, bring your slip 'n slide, have a little fun, but don't expect to get the grime off your body ever again!!!

Me? I'm past anger and feeling mostly DESPERATE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #33
48. I don't believe those numbers
polls are pretty much skewed these days....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-12-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. Actions speak louder than words. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
19. I'll believe it when I see it.
And I don't mean that as a knock against Obama per se, because I feel this way about all politicians. Talk is cheap is D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. master thespian - he took actions contributing to the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Damn straight. I was just reading another thread about how 28 drilling contracts have been fast
tracked since the spill... livid huh? Because now it'll be mildly more annoying to bat for the oil companies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. I am livid at the administration for failing to lead on this issue.
And believe me, there will be consequences, in so far as I am able.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. This is false....
There is moratorium on new leases. Twenty-eight pending leases have gone through environmental review, but will not be released pending a further safety review.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
34. so 27 new permits have NOT been issued since the disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #34
38. They are distorting the facts....
The Center has opposed Salazar from the time of his nomination. And if you read their convoluted press release closely, you'll see that it's the environmental review that has gone forward. The permits themselves have not been issued pending a safety review, which could (and in all likelihood, will, send the process back to Square One).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Those are environmental reviews and the result of those reviews could shut down any notion...
Edited on Thu May-13-10 10:06 AM by phleshdef
...of drilling in the areas being reviewed. Considering current circumstances, I wouldn't be surprised if that is what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
37. Yea, because allowing exploration of the Atlantic coastline caused the spill in the gulf.
Obama was wrong to believe that offshore drilling didn't come with risks. But there is not one single action carried out by his administration that you can trace to this particular incident, not one. BP was drilling in this area long before Obama was even a candidate for President. Regulations and oversight were laxed way before Obama was even a candidate for President. You most certainly can judge the actions that he takes now, in response to the disaster and in response to future drilling proposals. But you can not make any honest claim that his actions contributed to this situation. Thats nothing more than a petty lie and I think you probably even know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. He continued the weak-assed epa policies and too much of the staff of his predecessor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phleshdef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Its unrealistic to expect ANYONE to have reformed all the potentially dangerous policies by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. If he has taken reform action, I apologize for missing it. I still see the polluters and despoilers
getting the first consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
42. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
25. Does that mean he will be cutting a radio spot for them next week?
Edited on Thu May-13-10 07:37 AM by freddie mertz
Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
31. so? until he sticks his neck out and does something bold for a change,
it's all full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. Good - I'm beyond livid at BP, big oil, Halliburton, ignorant voters, Obama's MMS...
Edited on Thu May-13-10 09:41 AM by polichick
...and Obama himself for cynically opening up more offshore drilling and lying to us about its safety.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
36. message: he cares
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. words.....but how about backing them up w/ actions, to show sincerity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
44. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
47. He's also irked by inequality, miffed by torture, steamed by war, and piqued by Wall Street
He's a man of a thousand emotions.

I think he's just mad because they humiliated him by screwing up right after he announced more drilling. I think the President is remarkably thin-skinned in private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:16 AM
Response to Reply #47
53. don't forget also, a "fierce advocate" of LGBT rights
and about a million other meaningless but eloquent, passionate-sounding phrases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
49. I'm sure BP is very scared at Obama's carefully-orchestrated "outrage"
Edited on Thu May-13-10 07:55 PM by brentspeak
Presidents like TR and Truman did more than simply "get livid".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
50. who knows maybe Rush and Glen Beck sabotaged the rig?
I mean, who goes round doing this sort of thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TripleKatPad Donating Member (241 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
51. I'm not holding my breath
I understand that there is much we don't know about how things really run behind the scenes.

But, oh how I wish PO would just come out and tell us that once he attained office, he found out he really has little say in how the corporations dictate that things must be.

A little truth might slap us upside the head.

Never mind. I'm about to turn a year older at midnight and am waxing poetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #51
52. A happy Birthday to you
may it be filled with your heart's desires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC