Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three Cheers for this one: "Obama shifts strategy away from war on drugs"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:27 AM
Original message
Three Cheers for this one: "Obama shifts strategy away from war on drugs"
WASHINGTON — Four decades after President Richard Nixon declared a war on drugs, the White House yesterday announced a shift in national drug policy that would treat illegal drug use more as a public health issue and plunge more resources into prevention and treatment.

The new drug control strategy boosts community-based antidrug programs, encourages health care providers to screen for drug problems before addiction sets in, and expands treatment beyond specialty centers to mainstream health care facilities.

President Obama called the plan a “balanced approach to confronting the complex challenge of drug use and its consequences.’’

His drug czar, Gil Kerlikowske, was more blunt.

“Calling it a war really limits your resources,’’ Kerlikowske said. “Looking at this as both a public safety problem and a public health problem seems to make a lot more sense.’’

http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/05/12/obama_shifts_strategy_away_from_war_on_drugs/


I am VERY glad to see this. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sparkly, you little drugster
Edited on Thu May-13-10 08:33 AM by madmax
does Stinkey know? ;) :rofl: Good post!

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Good thing for me caffeine's not illegal!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPedigrees Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. When caffeine is deemed illegal, I'll be a criminal! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would be happier about this if President Obama was not against legalizing marijuana. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. False. Law Enforcement will go on same as always
With increased spending as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Exactly. Until I see actual budget cuts enacted for agencies like the DEA
I remain skeptical of all this to say the least. Law enforcement will not just sit by and watch their goldmine disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Actions speak louder than words. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. From the Article

"The policy shift follows several other drug policy reforms since Obama took office. Obama signed a measure repealing a two-decade old ban on the use of federal money for needle-exchange programs to reduce the spread of HIV.

"His administration also said it will not target medical marijuana patients or caregivers as long as they are complying with state laws and are not fronts for drug traffickers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Legalize it. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. I'm glad about the switch. Republicans will bitch because it takes the money away from
prisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Of course! And treating it as a health problem -- well, that's socialized medicine again!!
After all, Jesus wouldn't help people, would he? :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. Obama is talking out of both sides of his mouth on this one
Just a few days ago his administration announced that it opposed efforts to legalize cannabis in California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You really don't know what the phrase " talking out of both sides of his mouth" means, do you? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Seems pretty appropriate in this case. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Doesn't look like it..all
it wanted was a cheap shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm very glad to see this too - it's decades overdue...
Now he needs to change his Republican tune about weed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. Better than usual but still fucking wrongheaded, stupid, backward,
evil, greedy, cowardly, and generally a waste of resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bullet1987 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-13-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. This article does not say the War on Drugs is over
Meaning the arrests, the money being funneled into the security state/prison complex. It simply says they're going to TRY another approach. It has nothing to do with changing the current marijuana laws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
19. This is a great strategy

Prevention= less addicts, less crime, better society. This obviously targets the kind of
drugs that destroy lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItNerd4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. Drug wars gone on for 40 years, nothing has changed. This is change.
Maybe some sanity will come to how the country deals with the drug problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vattel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. a step in the right direction
now he needs to be a leader with vision and courage and propose to Congress amendments to ridiculously harsh federal drug laws
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC