NYT: Calculations of Size of Gulf Spill Are Questioned

[KansasVoter]

Two weeks ago, the government put out a round estimate of the size of the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico: 5,000 barrels a day. Repeated endlessly in news reports, it has become conventional wisdom.

But scientists and environmental groups are raising sharp questions about that estimate, declaring that the leak must be far larger. They also criticize BP for refusing to use well-known scientific techniques that would give a more precise figure.

The criticism escalated on Thursday, a day after the release of a video that showed a huge black plume of oil gushing from the broken well at a seemingly high rate. BP has repeatedly claimed that measuring the plume would be impossible.

The figure of 5,000 barrels a day was hastily produced by government scientists in Seattle. It appears to have been calculated using a method that is specifically not recommended for major oil spills.

Ian R. MacDonald, an oceanographer at Florida State University who is an expert in the analysis of oil slicks, said he had made his own rough calculations using satellite imagery. They suggested that the leak could “easily be four or five times” the government estimate, he said.

<snip>

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/us/14oil.html?hp

[NYC_SKP]

1. Another post suggests as much up to 70,000 barrels/day.

Via NPR:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4380567&mesg_id=4380567

:wow:

[Skink]

2. surf's up.