Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC election analysis just got Stupid!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:29 PM
Original message
MSNBC election analysis just got Stupid!
Edited on Tue May-18-10 09:31 PM by FrenchieCat
By same guy Lawrence O'Donnell who said Health Care Reform was DOA! :rofl:

I would expect more.

He said This is a devastating Obama loss, that his endorsements ain't worth shit.

He isn't smart enough to understand that Obama got a Dem Vote till next January.....
and also got a brand new spanking Democrat for the November election,
instead of a turncoat! :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Notice they don't say anything about the PA-12th
Specter's loss means Obama is done! Oh and Rand Paul means tea baggers are really really powerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yep. How do they get away with that shit? They lying and
half ass false analysis?

You think they are told to say these things?
To talk about a predetermined "angle"?
Cause I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Republicans winning in November is a story that keeps people watching
If the story were that the Democrats will probably hold power but lose some seats, there would be less drama and it would be less exciting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I am sick to death of Olbermann. Matthews and Ed
They are just like the rest of them. Ratings, stir the pot, sell ads, make a shitload of money. The hell with all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I just turned that BS off
I never ever watch that crap anymore. I turn it on for 10 minutes to see the election results and, as usual, it's all BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. LOL. I don't watch it at all. I come here to find out what happened..LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. I liked it when Tweety compared Specter to someone dressing as a woman
to try to escape the Titanic. That was more insightful than Mr O'Donnell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Larry goes nuts at times
I don't think the White House gives a shit, and perhaps they're even relieved. Specter should've simply retired anyway. The party was supporting Specter simply because he was the incumbent, no matter how lame of an incumbent he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. Other than the liberal talk show hosts, that station is..
the typical MSRNC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You mean to tell me you don't like those "Inside Prison Gates" shows?????????? LOLOL
Edited on Tue May-18-10 09:35 PM by BrklynLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
O is 44 Donating Member (740 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks Frenchie I was just about to scream....
what a stupid analysis. He does know that Sestak is a Democrat, sheesh why would the WH be embarrassed. What an idiot, for someone who worked in the senate I would expect him to be a bit smarter. He knows the President was paying him back for his vote on healthcare. Fineman was no better he was another complete idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. WTH is wrong with lawrence
o'donnell? It wouldn't take much political knowledge to see this is actually good for the Obama admin.

Unless he's now a corporatemediawhore and doesn't believe a word he's saying?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well, I'm don't wan to think that he is stupid,
so perhaps these talking points were agreed upon before the elections,
and that's that. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. And, Mark Critz WINS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-18-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Fineman still talking about how the Democrats are gonna be handed their hats!
They should put this guy on the comedy circuit!

Not that Rachel isn't included; probably cause she would make sense,
and we can't have that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC