Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media coverage is so biased, Even MSNBC is in on it. They have created the scenario

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:21 AM
Original message
Media coverage is so biased, Even MSNBC is in on it. They have created the scenario
The numbers of the Tea Party have been greatly inflated, the reason for certain election results are blown way out of proportion. Every Democratic loss is Obama's fault, every Democratic win is hardly mentioned.

Sarah Palin has been turned into a major player becauser the media wanted her to be. Never has a defeated VP candidate gotten so much attention. Especially one who by all accounts caused thier presidential candidate to lose worse than he might have.

Just look how none of them are calling Rand Paul to task for any of his nutty views. The spin is that "The Tea Party Candidate Wins Big." In truth, he got fewer votes than the two top Democratic candidates.

The media was positive the Republcian's would win Murtha's district. When they didn't, little is said about it.

This is what happened when Jimmy Carter was elected in 1976. During the campaign the media was mostly very positive about him. As soon as he took officde they did nothing but tear him down. They are doing the same thing with Obama.

The MSM believes they were in love with Obama during the campaign. Now they are going the other way to prove they are "fair."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too late. BTW, media never loved Obama, everyone in DC knew by 2006 that Dem would win 2008
and IF the corpmedia could have changed that they would have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Disagree, Obama got increbile press coverage.
I do not think another candidate could have survived the Jerimiah Wright thing. While I think a lot of what Wright said was true, this would have been a magic bullet for a lesser candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It was Obama, not the MSM, who handled Wright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-21-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. And it was the blogophere, not the MSM
Edited on Fri May-21-10 08:16 PM by rocktivity
who pointed out that the Clintons also had ties to Wright, and that the GOP candidate had ties to controversial clergypeople of their own. The MSM doesn't have the last word about what goes on anymore.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Baloney - media didn't LOVE Obama when they played that tape repeatedly for a month.
Edited on Wed May-19-10 11:14 AM by blm
Obama survived it because GEORGE W BUSH and DICK CHENEY were SO bad that their pet media couldn't help protect them as much as they needed, anymore at that point. Bush WH looked SO bad that Wright tape didn't knock off Obama the way media hoped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. Exactly - the media blew the Wright thing into a story for weeks
Compare that to the almost no coverage given to Sarah Palin's extreme anti-semetic church. Remember that Reverend Wright was not Obama. There was FAR less time given to outrageous things McCain himself did - like singing "bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran"
http://mccainsings.com/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. No, the "media"whores didn't love Obama..
Obama survived because he's Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Yes, he did, but what it mostly negative or mostly favorable?
PEW did a survey in which people were asked who they thought was more favored by the media--Obama or McCain. Though most people said Obama (because that's what the MSM and Republicans kept repeating), the analysis actually showed that Obama received much more negative coverage, a la Reverend Wright, William Ayers, Muslim and "birther" rumors, than did John McCain.

In other words, the fact that the MSM never brought up the Keating 5 scandal; never mentioned McCain's infidelities; never went after McCain for flip-flopping on immigration and a host of issues; never really took him to task for negative campaiging--says so much.

It is a myth that the M$M loves Obama. In fact, it's a lie that was first peddled by Hillary Clinton, then John McCain. It's a common tactic that politicians resort to when they are losing in an election. The easiest thing to do is blame the "LIBRUL MEDIA" for their loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Funny, they didn't worry about being fair when they fawned all over Junior.
All during both campaigns and for almost his entire two terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree, they went before Bush on bended knee.
It was embarassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
35. Not "bended knee", "bended kneeS."
That IS the time-honored position for a blowjob, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. It is amazing to watch how they go out of their way to put the Democrats in a bad light
Take solace in the fact that a month ago they were saying the Democrats were going to lose Murtha's seat, and the other races were going to go with the establishment

In other words, their analysis was completely wrong, and has been wrong for quite sometime now

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The problem of course is that being wrong doesn't stop them......
hardly even slows them down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. It doesn't stop them because they are trying to shape the future with propaganda
What else can explain their refusal to fact-check Republicans and devote so much air time to a bunch of angry fringe kooks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Exactly! That should be against the law!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, they never exposed Ron Paul's nutty views
either...so why would they with his son? Chris Mathews does mention that both Pauls are nutty and want to do away with everything from the Dept. of Ed to EPA to Social Security...


Yeah, these are things that have to be pointed out, because Paul is making way with ending wars and legalizing pot...while not mentioning his odd-ball theories...



I just cannot get over a man named after a second rate romance novelist is being seen as even viable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
10. "Sarah Palin has been turned into a major player becauser the media wanted her to be. "
You have got to be kidding? You seem to be confusing media hype with reality. Yes, the media can create perception, but it's only valid if people buy it.

"The MSM believes they were in love with Obama during the campaign."

Sounds more like what you believe. Regardless, it's nonsense.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Prosense, the whole world believes media was pro Obama in 2008
Perception is reality in prolitics. When are you going to learn that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. BS - that's the GOP lie mainstreamed by corpmediawhores.
Funny, you certainly are a HUGE fan of RW lies spun thru the corpmedia - that's MY perception from watching you take every opportunity to REPEAT the lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yeah, the "bitter" and Wright controversies were pro "elitist" Obama.
What utter bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Not close to true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. MSNBC is always in on it
there is no difference between MSNBC, CNN, and FOX other than the nighttime line up. MSNBC echoes what the rest of MSM is saying. They are all the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dumpdabaggers Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Even Maddow seems to be becoming more establishment media as she has been accepted by them.
I could not believe how she failed to challenge that RNC dick last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
34. Are we watching the same show?
She latched onto Paul like a pit bull, and never let go. Let him make a complete ass of himself. Forced him to, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. DAMMIT, MSNBC.... TELL THE TRUTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. MSM has become "drunk with power"......
They enjoy writing the scripts for what the American people will...or will not....hear. And will NOT give up their power to manipulate the minds of people who cannot think for themselves.

(We need to demand more from them.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
19. well you have to admit palin is pretty hot, how else does someone
get thousands of dollars for a speech in which they read stupid jokes off of their blackberry. isn't America grand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Meh...Peggy Hill with big, nice hair, and an old hot but fading stripper body
Palin's hawtness is terribly overrated, in my opinion. She'd probably fall to average at best with a human proportion hair budget.

In 3-5 years she'll be washed up because those wrinkles will be more clear and there'll likely be a sag here and there, even with a full moose diet and a great trainer because she is absolutely intellectually incurious, hasn't a single idea, lacks vision of any sort, and is quite lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Peggy Hill is a lot smarter and more empathic then that hateful vindictive quitter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Talking pure appearance here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
20. The M$M are not friendly. Their function is societal perception control
(aka propaganda), not to deliver information that could empower the body politic to challenge the actual structures of (banking/corporate/MIC) power that rule.

M$M operate according to three primary rules:

1) Never turn public attention to the actual structures of power that control government, who they are and how they operate.
2) Keep public attention focused on divisive issues and politics that neither reveal nor threaten the actual structures of power.
3) Give the public a distorted perception of itself as effectively powerless: distracted, divided, agitated and fearful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
State the Obvious Donating Member (561 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Your 3 points are excellent reminders of what is REALLY happening. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-19-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
21. While it is true that Paul got fewer votes than the top two Democrats
i wouldn't read too much into that. That is a pretty common pattern in KY. Bunning got fewer votes in his last primary than either of the Democrats and still won. Its also happened that way in governor's races. Its not surprsing since these are closed primaries and there are a lot more registered Democrats in KY than registered repubs. The good news from where I sit is that as a percentage of registered voters, turnout among Democrats was even with turnout among repubs (around 33 percent for both parties), which suggests that there is not the "enthusiasm gap" among the most active voters that some have hypothesized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. kick -- this needs more attention and more recs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. Unrec'd
In five minutes, I found stories at ABC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS and most major papers about Rand Paul's remarks.

I found stories at AP, Newsweek, the Economist, CBS and even Fox News about Democratic enthusiasm and Republican concern over the results of PA-12.

Let's not read conspiracy theories into every aspect of the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. He gone
See profile. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-20-10 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
31. Cable News is all about Sensationalism
If they can get this kind of a rise out of you. They have done their job.

Thats why its great when the President calls them out in speeches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-25-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
37. HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC