Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wall Street hoping that the Senate bill gets watered down

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:42 PM
Original message
Wall Street hoping that the Senate bill gets watered down
Edited on Mon May-24-10 02:45 PM by ProSense
Senate bill provision:

Derivatives

Mandates exchange trading and clearing for most derivatives, with a limited end-user exemption. Forces federally insured banks to spin-off their swaps desks.


Buried in a NYT article titled, "As Reform Takes Shape, Some Relief on Wall St."

A Senate proposal calls for Wall Street firms to wall off their derivatives businesses and place them in subsidiaries requiring substantially more capital. That would be a major blow — but this provision faces opposition from the both the financial industry and federal banking regulators, and is likely to be shelved or watered down before final passage.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wall Street is happy with the bill. Greatly relieved. in spite of public
posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Idiotic.
The notion that Wall Street is looking forward to big financial institutions being forced to spin off non-bank entities and the entire reform package is ludicrous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. The article is to psych people out and
Edited on Mon May-24-10 03:10 PM by ProSense
distract from the fact that the bill currently includes major reforms:

Though there is anger in some quarters, other financial executives seem resigned to the changes, acknowledging that after the industry’s excesses set the stage for the deepest recession since the 1930s, there were bound to be major reforms.


Yeah, they're just pleased as punch that major reforms are being presented.

Maybe they'll send the lobbyists home and leave the derivatives provision intact. After all, isn't it worth celebrating?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Of course they are..as Krugman wrote
the corps don't like regulations and that those for wall street, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. So in other words, MORE watered down...Nothing new here.
And i very much expect it will be more watered down. Wall Street is already pleased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wall Street hopes to dodge two reform bullets

Wall Street hopes to dodge two reform bullets

By David Ellis, staff writer

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- With any luck, Wall Street can still escape two of the harshest elements of Washington's reform efforts.

The two measures, included in the Senate bill passed last week, take direct aim at some of the more risky -- and profitable -- parts of banks' business.

One proposal would require financial firms to spin off their trading desks that deal in derivatives.

The other -- dubbed the Volcker Rule for its proponent, former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker -- would ban banks from wagering with the firm's own money, what the industry calls "proprietary trading." Firms would also be restricted from investing in or sponsoring private-equity funds or hedge funds.

The restrictions, if included in the final bill, would hit bank profits.

more


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC