Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Dems Seek Probe Into Transocean’s $1 Billion Shareholder Payout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:08 PM
Original message
Senate Dems Seek Probe Into Transocean’s $1 Billion Shareholder Payout
http://washingtonindependent.com/85569/senate-dems-seek-probe-into-transoceans-1-billion-shareholder-payout

Transocean Ltd., the Swiss company operating the Deepwater Horizon oil rig when it blew up last month, raised plenty of eyebrows last week when it announced its plan to pay out $1 billion in dividends to shareholders.

“It’s heartwarming to see that Transocean, the same company that rushed to limit its liability in the Deepwater Horizon rig explosion, seemed not to hesitate at all when it came to the decision to distribute its profits,” one maritime expert wrote of the plan.

Today, 18 Senate Democrats took the scrutiny a long step further, asking the Justice Department to investigate whether those payouts are appropriate “at a time when may be responsible for financial damages related to the massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.”

“Transocean’s stockholders,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, ”should not take huge profits from polluting our country’s Gulf Coast.”

We are concerned that such action to quickly move money out of corporate coffers to individual investors may make it more difficult to pursue liability claims against the company. Families of those who died in the disaster, the fishing industry that has been devastated by the oil spill and the governments that have worked full-time to clean up this spill deserve better. Transocean has also reported that it expects to make a $270 million profit on its insurance policy for the Deepwater Horizon, since the rig was insured for more than it was worth.

The letter, spearheaded by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), also drew the support of Democratic Sens. Pat Leahy (Vt.), Charles Schumer (N.Y.), Tom Harkin (Iowa), Robert Menendez (N.J.), Mark Begich (Alaska), Byron Dorgan (N.D.), Patty Murray (Wash.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Bill Nelson (Fla.), Mark Pryor (Ark.), Mark Udall (Colo.), Jeff Merkley (Ore.), Max Baucus (Mont.), Amy Klobuchar (Minn.), Michael Bennet (Colo.), Blanche Lincoln (Ark.) and Robert Casey (Pa.).

Of note, Transocean is not exactly known for its corporate citizenship. Until recently, the company was based in Houston, but officials moved the headquarters to Switzerland “to avoid paying higher corporate taxes.“


Only 18? What was the reason for the 41 other ones not to sign this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some may not even be back in town
Many likely left for the weekend. Not signing a letter like this does not mean they disagree - they and their staff may not have reviewed it yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's get President Obama to agree with this modest investigation.

"What was the reason for the 41 other ones not to sign this?"

Answer: Way too radical or liberal or progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I hope this probe includes some strongly worded letters! Or better yet a "release"
Edited on Mon May-24-10 04:22 PM by Dr Fate
Please tell me that we will be able to read some "releases" about this on the internet!

That will show them-we are going to have a PROBE!

But seriously- what needs to be "probed?" Threaten to cut off all their subdsidies, tax cuts, no-bid contracts- any and every benefit that they directly or indirectly receive from our gov., until they pledge that amount to the clean up effort.

LOL! I know, I know- that's too "far left." Americans are "center right" and they would oppose all that. Sure they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC