LeftyAndProud60
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:23 PM
Original message |
Do u think this bribing scandal is more about Obama or more about Sestak? |
|
My conspiracy theory is they can't prove intent unless someone in the WH was dumb enough to say flat out that if u drop this they would give you a job. I pray nobody was that stupid.
I think Republicans want to hurt Sestak as much as possible so they can get that seat in Nov.
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Sestak. WH may have made some vague offer re if he didn't want to stay in the House but that |
|
was about it and Sestak played it up for political reasons which was really stupid.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I agree with you Pirate. I think Sestak is a bit of a loose cannon. I can't realy trust him. |
|
I kinda liked him at first, but he got kinda hack on me after a while. My inner gut told me "ehhh." so I am hesitant. Not good, not bad, just a little wary...
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
16. If "loose cannon" you mean honest. Then yes, WYSIWYG. How very refreshing. eom |
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
DFLforever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's how it appears to me. |
|
That's why Sestak hasn't responded to calls to be more explicit.
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
11. I cant figure out why he played it up |
|
Edited on Wed May-26-10 06:55 PM by MadBadger
He just wins the nomination and tries to alienate the White House? Whats the point of that? He'll sure as hell want Obama to be in a lot of places in PA come the fall.
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
18. Wait. This news came out months ago, it was FOX who's spinning this as recent. eom |
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. He mentioned it during the primary battle and, after he won, he was too proud to own up to his own |
|
Edited on Wed May-26-10 07:19 PM by Pirate Smile
exaggeration.
He was using it during the primary to show how he was independent and fighting everyone. Now he's just made a problem where the WH keeps getting punched in the face because of it. Way to make friends and influence people, Joe. :eyes:
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. How do you know it was an exaggeration? Rendell was downright nasty and Rahm was not |
|
much better?
I'm not saying that anything illegal was done but the TRUTH is "the truth."
|
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It's more about Republican nontroversies, and the suckers who believe them. |
FrenchieCat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. You mean those that post about this non-issue all of the time? |
HiFructosePronSyrup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. They'd be one or the other, yes. |
Kingofalldems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Yeah, it says more about the repus and the corporatemediawhores |
|
than Joe or the White House.
|
grantcart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Closer to Bill Clinton's BJ |
Sky Masterson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:47 PM
Response to Original message |
8. It isn't anything more than republicans trying to muddy the Obama waters |
|
They've got nothing else to offer
|
Political Tiger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I think this "scandal" only exists in the hopes of the Reich but it's definitely about Obama |
|
It's like how they went after Clinton 24/7, looking for anything, no matter how minute, to try to impeach him. It's what they do.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
13. "non-issue" - same thing repubs said about watergate. time will tell all nt |
DearAbby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Miss Cleo read the entrails of a goat, and told the white house that Sestak would be running before Sestak himself made up his mind. WOW
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
15. It's a made up scandal and the M$M lets FOX set the news agenda. |
|
Neither are to blame because neither did anything illegal.
|
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message |
17. The WH has not spoken about it because they do not want to bury Sestak, he was just running ... |
|
his mouth and has really stepped in the shit by doing so
The WH did not offer him a job in return for quitting the primary, at most they told Sestak they were backing Specter and if he wanted to drop out instead of running against a incumbent (like a good Dem should) they might be able to find something for him to do.
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Yes, it's just Rahm being his typical "polite." |
krawhitham
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
24. YES because Rahm is the root of all EVIL |
|
I bet a lot less gets done when he is no longer the White House Chief of Staff
Then everyone on DU and bitch about nothing getting done instead of bitching about that cocksucker Rahm Emanuel
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. Yes, I think you have us all figured out. |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
23. I figure that they have to prove quid pro quo |
|
And who is going to spell that out if it happened.
There's also Romanoff in Colorado. He was supposedly offered something in communications with the public.
I hope the Republicans don't get to be in the driver's seat looking into this poop.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
26. I think it's less a scandal and more Republicans wanting a Monica |
|
Funny you're so into it....
|
boppers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:36 PM
Response to Original message |
27. I am outraged that somebody made a job offer. Totally outraged. |
|
In related news, I am angry about my socks.
|
hay rick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-26-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It's about the media breathing life into a zombie issue with the hope that it might splatter blood and gore on both.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message |