|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Perky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:23 AM Original message |
WOuld you have cared if Bush had offered Someone a job to stay out of a Senate race?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CatWoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. besides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. It is...the problem is that morans like Durbin have taken the Repuke bait |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WI_DEM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:27 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. can the dems ever be united? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I've never seen it...what galled me was even during the faux impeachment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:59 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. Excellent point! If democratic legislators wouldn't take their issue's from FOX ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 10:29 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Thanks...they need to hit back at crap like this....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoebe Loosinhouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. No , the problem is that the White House did not mount an effective response the second |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
4. NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. Deleted message |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
6. It's not an issue as long as the person is qualified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demoiselle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
7. Not one little bit. Good grief, are Dems trying to make something of it now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoCubsGo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 10:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
14. No, the repugs are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. No. White houses hold and withhold support for candidates in various ways all the time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
9. would that be a common response on DU? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 09:59 AM Response to Original message |
10. shrub maintained too high a level of outrage to care much, to be honest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
13. No. That's not the point for me. The point for me is the exposure of the WH's special treatment of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
uponit7771 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 11:08 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. ....this is good for the WH, it shows they didn't throw specter to the wolves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katandmoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 02:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Right - they didn't throw an opportunistic turncoat to the wolves. They went to BAT for HIM over a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jenmito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
17. Only if that person was unqualified for the job. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeyondGeography (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
18. Intra-party hardball...couldn't be surprised about that or give a shit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
old mark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
20. It is called Politics, and everyone does it - it only becomes "wrong" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phx_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 12:23 PM Response to Original message |
21. As long as they were qualified and it wasn't a Supreme Court nom. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
retread (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri May-28-10 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
23. Why do you think he didn't? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:14 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC