Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FYI - The White House wanted Sestak to keep his House seat so could only offer positions compatible

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:21 AM
Original message
FYI - The White House wanted Sestak to keep his House seat so could only offer positions compatible
with that.

That is why it was unpaid and advisory.

Why is that hard to believe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. No kidding.
Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asphalt.jungle Donating Member (792 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. they want moderate republicans to leave there house seats for non-cabinet level
appointments. not democratic votes they may need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think the White House made an offer
that Sestak could refuse. That way they honored their promise to support Spector when Spector switched from Repub to Dem, but they also made it easy for Sestak to refuse to drop out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think you are on to something there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Great thought, and now they are taking bullets that should keep Spector on board through January
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. cause no one sells out for so little
perhaps Sestak was cheap, or perhaps they had to offer him more to get him out of the way.
If they offered so little no wonder he refused.

I thought they offered him a "job", not some silly "perk". Why sell out for something that has little power and no pay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Because they probably did not expect him to take the offer.
They probably did it to appease Specter, for whatever reason. Specter probably got assurances from the WH when he switched that they would help him in his re-election efforts and obviously a primary opponent did not help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You thought they offered a job
because that's what Sestak said. Based on this information (and it is too official to doubt its veracity), Sesatk "mis-spoke" when it was convenient for him to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It is what it is whether you believe it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-10 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. Are you saying Sestak would give up to be a U.S. senator
for an unpaid job? Seems implausible to me. But then what do I know
about how to dissuade the vice-admiral from being ambitious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC