bigjohn16
(747 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:07 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 10:08 AM by bigjohn16
We'll evaluate in December 2010 weather we will be able to meet that objective. It was an answer to the question of whether 2011 is firm.
|
high density
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:11 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Seems like a reasonable comment from somebody who cannot see the future. NM |
bigjohn16
(747 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. You're right that a firm draw down date of 2011 is not in our future. nt |
bigjohn16
(747 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
3. He just said that the transfer of security will be condition based. One more nail in the 2011 coffin |
optimator
(606 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message |
4. he sounds confident in his own job |
|
There still no democrats to fill this job after a year?
|
bigjohn16
(747 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. This seems to be administration policy not just Secretary Gates. nt |
onehandle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-02-09 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. General Wesley Clark is eligible for that position next year. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:11 AM
Response to Original message |