Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Maureen Dowd's new Obama-bashing piece:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:09 AM
Original message
Maureen Dowd's new Obama-bashing piece:
It's not the media that is bad, it's Obama who can't play the game, or something like that. This woman is in a serious crusade against him.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. What do you expect from Whoreen Dowd?
She's really the penultimate presstitute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Meh, she smears 'em all with equal vacuousness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep. It's just her job
Now that the ox getting gored (pardon the unintended pun) has a D after the name, too many people get their knickers in a twist. Too many forget IT'S HER JOB.

Really confident people don't need to get so defensive all the time. Methinks there is a lot of overcompensating going on with the chorus ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Eff her. She's yesterday's news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Link?
:ahrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm guessing it's this one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demtenjeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. much like many here
sadly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Silly Maureen
The relationship between the press and our elected officials is supposed to be adversarial. Like so many of her ilk, she's forgotten the basic tenets of her profession. She would rather be the news than report it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Most of them are that way, for sure.
I'm so sick of them.

I wish they would report the news, not keep trying to manipulate it.

Asshats!

:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. umm, Dowd is paid for her opinion, she is NOT a news reporter.
you might want to learn the difference, it's not exactly rocket science. :eyes:

and i bet you didn't even read what she wrote. all she implied was that Obama sends Biden out to deal and shcmooze with the press because HE doesn't like them. :shrug:

yeah, real "SCATHING".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Which is a smart move.
Biden in person is a very warm, charming guy. And he's a bullshit artist of the first magnitude.

He's the kind of guy that you want to grab by the arm and say, "C'mon, we're going to the bar"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 06:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. The opinion addresses the administration's relationship with the media.
Ergo, poster's comments were completely in line with the content of her opinion piece. There was no need for you to take such a condescending tone. Did it make you feel better? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. I read it
And I am fully aware Ms. Dowd makes her living as an OP-ED writer. I am also aware that there's no requirement that an opinion journalist be objective. However, when you compare the work of Ms. Dowd to her boss, Frank Rich, you find that Mr. Rich is able to express opinion without egoism. Ms. Dowd has always struck me as an insecure person, compensating through viciousness.

Regardless of all of that, in this particular piece, she comes to the defense of the Washington DC press. In doing so, she fails to realize the incredible irony of her action. The DC press have all become a bunch of Maureen Dowds, convinced that they are far more relevant and clever than the people and issues they cover. They run around scrounging up sensationalist drama because that gets them on the teevee. Instead of challenging Dubya and his minions, they took the lazy way out and fell for the myth of "access". They were cowed by that administration's threats and smiled gleefully during every dog and pony show. The ones who reported on BushCo favorably were featured on the air. The ones who didn't fell off the planet. The result is that we are now flooded with celebrity journalists who have forgotten how to report actual news. They think that being chummy with politicians is an adequate replacement for investigation.

President Obama is not playing that silly game. If the DC press wants a story, they're going to have to work for it. I've read a number of press pool reports where these "journalists" get butthurt because Obama sneaks off without telling them. They should be ashamed for allowing themselves to become so complacent that they aren't on top of his every move. He isn't going to schmooze with them or serve them canapés. If they want the story, they're going to have to do it the old-fashioned way - leg work.

RIP - Jack Anderson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 04:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. Dorothy Pucker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. The comments are very good reading. Of the comments shown
so far (that have made it past the censors), most are sympathetic to the president and are taking Maureen and the M$M to task for their lack of serious attention to the nation's problems. If modo was expecting any sympathy she's not getting it. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. There is a general knowledge that this is not the Press of the JFK
years either, something she avoids. There are far more pundits than Journalists out there, and the whole thing has come back to Yellow Journalism as it's worst.

There is very little actual reporting anymore, it is mostly about people w/access to a camera and filling in time w/anything that comes along...except honest reporting. The days of Huntley/Brinkley and Cronkite are long gone, we don't get news anymore, we get editorials and spitball fights.

When we have a media and "news" organizations that find the death of a celebrity more important than the death of the Northern edge of the Gulf of Mexico, we can see just how bad off we truly are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. You are completely correct. The 24 hour news has a lot to do with that too.
Gotta fill up that time somehow.
I will say that watching CNN during the oil spill, there is some good reporting on the effects on the environment. But their pundits are terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Agreed; but this is the same type of response she gets every week
and all she does is double down on superficial bullshit.

This is the Times at its worst. She's basically tenured; palsy-walsy with Boy Publisher, a columnist for life. And an utter waste of space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. 1999 Pulitzer Prize for mean-girl cattiness about Clinton/Lewinsky. (nt)
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 09:08 AM by philly_bob
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah, cuz that's what he should spend his time doing -- playing games with the media.
Someone needs to tell the media to fuck off since it's obvious they either can't do their jobs, or they don't understand what their job is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
19. She was on a crusade against Al Gore in 2000
And she lied about him repeatedly along with Frank Rich. They have no credibility at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
20. back when she was trashing Clinton and praising Obama some of us tried to tell you
she was a crackpot who couldn't be trusted. We were called racist crackpots for our trouble. All I can say now is I told you so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PopSixSquish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Maureen Dowd and Sally Quinn Have Long Thought Themselves the Arbiter of Who is In and Who is Out
when in reality both are nasty pieces of work who will turn on their column subjects at the slightest change in the breeze. Both trashed the Clintons and the Gores with gleeful abandon.

Neither went after the Obamas at first but certainly took the opportunity to sideswipe Desiree Rogers as the eviliest evil that ever eviled when the state dinner crasher fandango happened. Ms. Quinn actually stated that since Ms. Rogers was "not of Washington", then of course something like this was going to happen.

Fuck both of them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Exactly. She's the prototypical Mean Girl who guards the clique
No one I know has read or taken her seriously since her Al Gore trashing days that gave us W.

No there there and never has been. Many posters on DU can turn a phrase better than she can with a lot more insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wandawilkerson Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Hear, hear!!!
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 08:20 PM by Beacool
Isn't it ironic? Now that the media's legs have mostly stopped tingling they get thrown under the bus. When they were endlessly trashing his opponent the same people thought that these members of the media were as insightful as the Oracle of Delphi.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's Ho-Do: What did you expect?
Maureen Dowd - the thinking man's Anne Coulter.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. Too Snarky for Me
and I like snark, but she does overkill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. Well, no right wing smear machine attack on a Democratic leader is complete without her twaddlings.
Seriously, can you tell me a Democratic leader with whom she has not found some "profound, yet heretofore unrevealed" moral flaw? It's like a game to her. What an utterly useless woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
30. Here's to hoping that Maureen says something really stupid and is forced to retire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC