Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Obama could improve his approval rating.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:10 PM
Original message
How Obama could improve his approval rating.
Edited on Wed Dec-02-09 07:11 PM by glen123098
Repeal don't ask don't tell. The vast majority support repealing it.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/01/14/obama.gays.military/

"Public opinion appears to be shifting on the matter. A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll conducted December 19-21 found that 81 percent of respondents believe openly gay people should be allowed to serve in the U.S. military, while 17 percent said they shouldn't. The poll's margin of error was plus-or-minus 3 percentage points."





How could he lose by doing that? I bet he would gain 10 points in the polls if he did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Requires congressional action
and I don't think the Blue Dogs are itching for a Gay Rights action right after the Health Care debate...and he panders to their wishes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. It seems like a winning fight though.
Why wouldn't Obama want to be on the side with 81 percent of Americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Because Blue Dogs are parnoid about anything that is a win for the party base
They are afraid that people might think they are a real democrat back home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He is....
DADT Likely To Be Part of Defense Bill

By Kerry Eleveld
Repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” will likely be included as part of next year’s Department of Defense authorization bill in both chambers of Congress, Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA) said Wednesday.

“Military issues are always done as part of the overall authorization bill,” Frank said, insisting that this has been the strategy for overturning the policy all along. “'Don’t ask, don’t tell' was always going to be part of the military authorization.”

Frank said he has been in direct communication with the White House, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office, and other Congressional leaders about the strategy for ending the 1993 ban on gays serving openly in the military.

Though some moderate Democrats have recently expressed concern about repealing the policy during a midterm election year, Frank said resolve at the White House has never wavered. “The Administration is totally committed to this and has been from the beginning,” he said.

Anecdotally, Frank recalled an incident earlier this year when Defense Secretary Robert Gates made a statement to reporters suggesting that repeal was still an open question.

“There was a point where Gates said, ‘If we repeal don’t ask, don’t tell,’ -- and the next day he said, ‘When we repeal don’t ask, don’t tell,’” said Frank. “That’s because Rahm called him up. The White House has been consistently committed.”

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2009/11/11/DADT... /

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't believe that poll, I think he would open
another can of worms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. It sure would help put more feet on the ground over there.
When we need as many as we can get. To have such a law in place when we're fighting two wars is stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC