Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

May 1, 2003 +2,407-- the number of days since chimpy declared "mission accomplished" in iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:30 AM
Original message
May 1, 2003 +2,407-- the number of days since chimpy declared "mission accomplished" in iraq
we are STILL there, let us remember. so, a timetable for withdrawal is announced for vietnamistan. great. anything can be announced, and, quite frankly, this country cannot AFFORD to wait and see if the timetable is real. how many people are going to die, or be seriously wounded--have their lives, and those of their families, ripped apart before this "timetable of withdrawal" actually happens. how many more trillions is it going to cost us, now and into the future?

personally, I think the post about marion, indiana, was brilliant--maybe that is what we should all do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. The withdrawl date for leaving Iraq is legally binding....
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 12:39 AM by Clio the Leo
... meaning if we dont leave by the date agreed upon, not only will the Iraqis be highly pissed at us, but probably the rest of NATO as well.

It's not something that we can change at whim.

The agreement said we had to be out of all major cities by June 30, 2009 and we did that.

We made one of those legally binding agreements, we can probably make another one.

Status of Forces Agreement, page 10
http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40011.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well-
We are replacing the troops with paid contractors for a net gain U.S. presence in Iraq.

The military industrial complex always figures a way around the laws, rules and benchmarks.


:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Is the problem contractors.....
..... or no bid contractors?

Keith reported "essentially no 'no bid' military contracting..." but since then, I haven't heard/read any press on the matter at all.

If you've got something, I'd love to read it. (serious request, not a challenge)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. and we are still leaving FIFTY THOUSAND troops there--some "withdrawal"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knightinwhitesatin Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. LOL
you know that we have routinely violated the SOFA with the ROK for about 50 years, right???? LORD have mercy......some people think a SOFA is something the US follows to the T.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. and the pom-pom squad, right on schedule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. One of the inherent dangers....
.... of posting in a forum where cheerleaders run rampant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC