WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:29 PM
Original message |
Chris, you are a dip shit... |
|
Of course senator Obama probably would have voted against his own bill. That's a given. But Chris, being a senator is not the same a being president. A president has different constitutional responsibilities than the president.
Being president, you are responsible for the defense of the country so the person in that position has to weigh a whole mess of other factors than just the parochial concerns of a senator.
|
bigjohn16
(747 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's an inconvenient truth isn't it. nt |
graywarrior
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I am so happy I do not watch Hardball anymore |
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
WCGreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
12. Sorry, expansion of the troop level in Afganistan... |
|
I don't believe there has to be a bill, but it will be a line item in the military budget.
|
Clio the Leo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Senator Obama would have voted for an appropriations bill for THIS war..... |
|
... I believe. He was ALWAYS for returning the focus back to Afghanistan. When he was, in an RFK-esque manner, denouncing Iraq as State Senator in Chicago in 2002, he did so saying that we needed to finish the fight in Afghanistan.
So I think as a US Senator, he would have voted in favor of an appropriations bill for Afghanistan. Pity Bush never gave him the chance.
|
Pirate Smile
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
21. He's talking about Tweety. Tweety doesn't get confused by facts when he has a set point he wants to |
|
push.
Last night I believe the point being pushed was - "Dems thought Obama was anti-war - both Iraq and Afghanistan - even though he was never against the Afghan War and actually campaigned on returning focus and increasing troops in Afghanistan but Dem voters are stupid and don't pick up on little details like that". You want to throw your remote through the TV but you don't :).
I'd say most Dem voters knew Obama's actual Afghanistan policy generally but that doesn't mean they necessarily agreed although I'd say over at least half did. This has been the policy of almost all Democrats in office since 2003 - the focus on Iraq has damaged our effort in Afghanistan and we need to focus more there - a lot of Dems now don't think Afghanistan is winnable based on how its deteriorated.
He turns arguments into caricatures and makes the groups involved into idiots.
|
CaliforniaPeggy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. It takes quite a lot of skill to understand in the here and now... |
|
To grasp just what the differences are between the role of Senator and President. And how those differences play out in the day-to-day workings of the government.
Besides, you are not a dipshit.
K&R
:P
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:35 PM
Response to Original message |
5. The fact is that sending more troops in under Bush is qualitatively and |
|
quantitatively different that what is happening with Obama and his administration.
What about this is so difficult to understand?
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:36 PM
Response to Original message |
6. A president has different constitutional responsibilities |
|
True, but we voted for the guy based on how he voted in the Senate, so he has a point.
Much of our problems with sitting Presidents seems to stem from them suddenly making decisions that the person they were before winning the office would be opposed to.
Its like a bait and switch.
|
impik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Actually, senator Obama was very much in favor of |
|
the war in Afghanistan. So was candidate Obama.
|
geckosfeet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message |
8. A president has different constitutional responsibilities than the president. ? |
|
We know what you meant but,,,
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He might not have voted against this bill. He voted 'for' the Patriot Act, etc. nt |
choie
(899 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
why bother with such facts? :sarcasm:
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. Excuse me, I for one welcome facts around here. |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
17. That's right and so did Hillary. |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. She did vote against it, but she and Obama were under very different pressures, so the |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 10:55 PM by Captain Hilts
comparison isn't fair to Obama.
But he very well might have voted to increase troops in Afghanistan. His statements suggest that might be the case.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
20. I don't understand why you're saying she voted against it |
|
when the evidence states she voted for it. "Republican challenger John Spencer falsely claims she opposes the Patriot Act, which she voted for twice.
John Spencer says Hillary Clinton "opposes the Patriot Act" when in fact she voted for the law in 2001 and again in 2006 when it was renewed." http://www.factcheck.org/article416.html
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. FISA. I'm thinking about FISA. Clinton and Obama are two peas in a pod on these issues. |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 11:54 PM by Captain Hilts
There is no difference between their views, just their circumstances.
He's no more progressive than she, to my great regret. That's why I supported Clark. As a former military man, he wouldn't have to "prove" himself on these issues as Obama and Clinton do. It's very tiring.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-04-09 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
23. I'm dealing in the reality we have and I |
|
appreciate what we do have ..not what coulda, shoulda, woulda.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Hey, no need to insult dip shits with this comparison. |
|
Tweety is just Tweety, and that seems to be incurable.
|
Hansel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 06:22 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Clearly Chris wasn't really listening when that tingle went up his leg. |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 06:23 PM by Hansel
Now I wonder how he got that tingle.
Obama was always for the Afghanistan War and got loud cheers at his rallies when he said he wants to refocus on it. How did Chris miss that?
|
Top Cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 07:56 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I am so sick of those motherfuckers... It is totally shameful |
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-03-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Tweety sometimes..okay a lot of times.. |
|
sounds like he doesn't get the hang of things.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message |