|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:11 PM Original message |
White House: Warren a top candidate for agency job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emeritus (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
1. Axelrod vs. Geithner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. i see no sign Axelrod supports Warren |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. Is that why he called her a champion for consumers and middle-class families? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Enrique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Geithner would say the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phleshdef (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Doesn't say that he doesn't either. Why even bring it up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. There is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Emeritus (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:21 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. A Warren aide goes further, implying Geithner has ALWAYS been against her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. So another anonymous source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. If this turns out, like so many before, to be merely a "placate the libs" message, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:30 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. And if he nominates her, will it trigger a build up a support amongst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:46 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Nope, not a chance! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Of course not. They'll find someone else who should have been nominated instead of her! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:35 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. "further" erosion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:38 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I would suggest that if he doesn't nominate our chosen person, it's not a betrayal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:21 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Not ALL, but MORE than he has done so far. Sure, he's better than McCain would have been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:27 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Actually I was talking about Warren. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
11. I have been utterly fascinated how an article on Huffington Post.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beetwasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Yeah, This Comment By Axelrod (Named), IMO, Is A MUCH Bigger Indicator |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spazito (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:18 PM Response to Reply #16 |
17. Exactly but it doesn't fit well with the "believe everything negative about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
impik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. They shouldn't waste time addressing baseless HuffPost rumors. It6's ridiculous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:20 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. It's ridiculous but a lot of the left get their incorrect facts from Huffpo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 01:44 PM Response to Original message |
22. More on Warren and other potential candidates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-16-10 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
23. Deleted message |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC