Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Jones: What I Heard Last Night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:55 PM
Original message
General Jones: What I Heard Last Night

What I Heard Last Night

Posted by Jim Jones on December 02, 2009

Last night, I accompanied the President to West Point as he spoke to the American people about his decision on the way forward in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This was an important moment for America, delivered in a stirring yet sober setting. Over four thousand people filled Eisenhower Hall -- proud and patriotic cadets and their families, West Point leadership, and members of the local community. Also in the audience were Secretary Clinton, Secretary Gates, Secretary Shinseki, General Petraeus (a graduate of West Point, along with General McChrystal), Admiral Mullen, members of Congress, and General Doug Lute and John Tien (also West Point graduates and members of my National Security Staff).

President Obama announced that he is ordering an additional 30,000 troops into Afghanistan. He highlighted that a large portion of these troops will be trainers, critically important as we have to start partnering Afghan security forces with our security forces in the field so that they are actually getting experience in securing these areas, and are then prepared to take a handoff as U.S. troops draw down. In the summer of 2011, we will begin a transition from this extended surge and start to transfer security responsibility to Afghan Security Forces. The slope, pace, and end point of this drawdown will be based on conditions on the ground. We will begin to make those assessments in December of 2010 after these additional troops have been in country for a year and we will be able to measure the progress that has been made with this strategy.

The President made it clear that he did not make this decision lightly. He made it because our own national security is at stake in Afghanistan and Pakistan: it is from this region that our country was attacked on 9/11, and it is where new attacks are being plotted. This is the reason American troops and those of our international allies are risking their lives. This resonates with Americans from all backgrounds. And having served in Afghanistan and Iraq during my forty years in the Marine Corps, I know this was the right decision. Our entire national security team is committed to the success of this strategy and we will hold ourselves and our partners accountable as we move forward to implement the President’s vision.


The President emphasized that the core goal of our mission in Afghanistan is unchanged from the strategy decision he made in March of this year: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda. We must keep the pressure on al Qaeda, and to do that, we must increase the stability and capacity of our partners in the region. And in this process, the President is going to hold the government of Afghanistan accountable for its performance, as he declared that the days of providing a blank check are over. We are committed to good governance in Afghanistan, all the more important now that their President begins his second term in office. The President speaks directly with President Karzai often, and has outlined to him the steps that we expect the Afghan government to take in improving governance and delivering services to its people.

We cannot separate our strategy in Afghanistan from our strategy in Pakistan. We will continue to use all aspects of our diplomatic and development tools to work with the Pakistanis to keep up the pressure on the extremists that are within their borders and the safe havens that exist there.

As the President said last night, we must come together to end this war successfully. What is at stake is the security of our homeland, our allies, and the common security of the world.

General Jim Jones, USMC (Ret) is National Security Advisor




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! Do you ever rest? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you ever get tired of posting your disdain for Obama?
I get plenty of rest. Thanks for asking.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I made no anti-Obama comments in this thread ... you're too quick this time. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What's certain is that you made no comment relevant to the OP.
People tend to do that when they can't deal with the facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ever on the job.
You gotta wonder how he always gets the WH press releases so quick.


He always bashes those who disagree in any way with Obama, and always - always dishes out praise for everything - everything coming from the WH. One sided posters lack relevance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. "He always bashes those who disagree in any way with Obama, and always - always dishes out praise"
Edited on Fri Dec-04-09 10:40 PM by ProSense
You should spend less time sniffing me and more time responding to the issues.

"One sided posters lack relevance." Unlike the extremely relevant comment you just posted?






edited typos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Also,
FYI for the next time you want to engage is this type of personal criticism: I'm a she.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Gotta give credit where credit is due.
....the embodiment of selfless Commitment & Discipline.

That poster's commitment to protecting the White House and "Centrist" ideology is unmatched on DU.
She has my respect.

I wouldn't work that hard unless I was paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Me neither.
Unless I were paid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Hehehaha
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 01:00 PM by PBS Poll-435
:rofl:



I swear that I don't even recognize this place anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Nope.
Like a dripping faucet, that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting this.
Some of you guys are really quick with the information, but then many of you DUers are much more attune to the internet than I am. Some people do not understand that.

I have been staying away from DU GD and DG:P because of the nastiness here. But every time I do venture over here my ignore list seems to gain some more occupants. It is beginning to look like it did during the primaries. ;)

I haven't been posting much because I don't want to get in the mix, but decided I would ignore the safety of just observing and give you a word of encouragement. Besides, I have been a long time Obama supporter and I am tired of people complaining about him doing exactly what he has said he would do if he became president. I don't always agree with him but I have known where he stood since 2004, and I don't remember him wavering on his stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-04-09 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Nice to see you, rebel! I checked
out your "hobby" and it sounds like what I really do. :)

Pro Sense, babylonsister and lots of other posters do a good service here by bringing on articles that I wouldn't be seeing otherwise..and then after they're posted we get to talk about it. How straightforward is that?

Talk about ignoring..I just did myself a really big favor after months and months of masochism and started using that feature again.

You're the one to talk to about Pres Obama..I've only been learning about his history and what he's about since Dec 2007(crash course!).

General James Jones sounds like a man on a mission too..get the soldiers in, do their job, and get them out.

Here's a website to help out with what the soldiers need over there in Afghanistan and Iraq.

http://www.anysoldier.com/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. The strategy in Pakistan
General Jones: "We cannot separate our strategy in Afghanistan from our strategy in Pakistan. We will continue to use all aspects of our diplomatic and development tools to work with the Pakistanis to keep up the pressure on the extremists that are within their borders and the safe havens that exist there."

From a Pakistani paper today:


LAHORE: Lahore High Court (LHC) Chief Justice (CJ) Khawaja Muhammad Sharif served notice on the Interior secretary for not replying to a petition against the alleged activities of Blackwater in the federal capital.
. . .

Barrister Zafarullah, the petitioner’s counsel, cited several news reports according to which American and Dutch nationals were found patrolling the federal capital’s streets with sophisticated weapons. He said the diplomats and marines of both the countries had also beat up the people. He said the “culprits of these incidents” were set free and no action was taken against them for violating the law of the land.
. . .
Illegal weapons: Seeking search of US embassy, he said the day Blackwater had stepped into Pakistan, terror acts and suicide attacks had been scaled up. The counsel also alleged that in the US embassy illegal arms and ammunition were being stored, which were being used for “sabotage acts” in the country.

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009%5C12%5C05%5Cstory_5-12-2009_pg7_7


Is this the strategy in Afghanistan, general?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Thanks for the article n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Oops, correction
The last line was supposed to read "Pakistan", not Afghanistan. Too late for edit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
18. Yeah
"What is at stake is the security of our homeland, our allies, and the common security of the world."

Pakistan has nukes.
Who made sure Pakistan has nukes? Dick Cheney. Since Pakistan has nukes, and Cheney made sure Pakistan has nukes, maybe Cheney has a deal with Paks to use the nukes when he wants?

Cheney has not gone away. Maybe all this is a reaction to Cheney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC