Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bigotry Takes a Hit. Prop 8 ruling is a turning point...there's no going back (Michelle Goldberg)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:01 AM
Original message
Bigotry Takes a Hit. Prop 8 ruling is a turning point...there's no going back (Michelle Goldberg)
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 07:03 AM by jefferson_dem
Bigotry Takes a Hit
by Michelle Goldberg

The California ruling overturning a ban on same-sex marriage will surely trigger a burst of homophobia. But it’s a turning point in the culture wars. Michelle Goldberg on why there’s no going back.

Most people who followed the Proposition 8 trial expected Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker to overturn California’s same-sex marriage ban. Still, the scope and breadth of the decision is thrilling. In clear, cogent prose, Walker systematically eviscerated every hackneyed canard and bad-faith assertion offered by religious conservatives to justify rank bigotry against gays and lesbians.

“Proposition 8 fails to advance any rational basis in singling out gay men and lesbians for denial of a marriage license,” Walker wrote. “Indeed, the evidence shows Proposition 8 does nothing more than enshrine in the California Constitution the notion that opposite-sex couples are superior to same-sex couples. Because California has no interest in discriminating against gay men and lesbians, and because Proposition 8 prevents California from fulfilling its constitutional obligation to provide marriages on an equal basis, the court concludes that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional,” the judge ruled.

“The decision recognizes that the legal battles against marriage rights for same-sex couples now no longer have a leg to stand on,” says Columbia Law School’s Suzanne Goldberg.

“It is a slam-dunk victory for same-sex couples and for the same-sex couples in this case,” says Suzanne Goldberg, director of Columbia Law School’s Center for Gender and Sexuality Law. “The decision recognizes that the legal battles against marriage rights for same-sex couples now no longer have a leg to stand on.”

And this isn’t just a victory for gays and lesbians. Walker’s ruling is made on explicitly feminist grounds. The restriction of marriage to heterosexual couples, he finds, “exists as an artifact of a time when the genders were seen as having distinct roles in society and in marriage. That time has passed.” The religious right has always known that gay rights and feminism are deeply intertwined, because both threaten the idea that gender roles are God-given, sharply delineated and immutable. Part of the brilliance of Walker’s decision is the way it roots out the premises of the anti-gay marriage argument and demolishes them.

<SNIP>

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-08-04/prop-8-overturned-vaughn-walkers-ruling-on-gay-marriage/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hope the Pres takes a hint and walks back his own bigotry on this issue.
Now would be an opportune time to be an advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would like him to just release a statement about the ruling
Even a negative one -- he acts like we don't exist most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's not true!
They just asked us for money. They KNOW we exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. You're right -- mea culpa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Can't risk offending the bigots in the big tent I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's exactly what it is
which in my mind is true cowardice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. He already did.
White House Statement on Proposition 8

A White House statement regarding Wednesday's ruling overturning Proposition 8 said President Barack Obama had spoken out against the measure because it was "divisive and discriminatory."

By Kerry Eleveld

A White House spokesperson sent the following statement to The Advocate regarding Wednesday's ruling declaring Proposition 8 unconstitutional:

“The President has spoken out in opposition to Proposition 8 because it is divisive and discriminatory. He will continue to promote equality for LGBT Americans.”

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/08/04/White_House_Statement_Prop_8/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm right -- the President didn't release a statement nor speak out
He sent a PR to the Advocate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Actually, POTUS has publicly opposed PROP 8 and issued another statement yesterday.
Leaving aside your loaded charge of "bigotry", we do agree that it's past time for him to stand up PROUD for equality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. It isn't a "loaded" charge -- the POTUS is against marriage equality
And, where was this statement? i didn't see it in the media at all last night, and I watched and read everything. Do you mean the statement you listed above sent to the Advocate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. You didn't see so that means it's untrue.
Does the media care really care and show EVERYTHING Obama does and say? No. You know that the media didn't show on television that Obama signed an American Indian protection bill---so what you're saying to me is that it's false. Anyone who's been here for the past 2 years is fully aware that the President opposed prop 8 and wrote against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
23. The man says, in ful hypocritical theatrics
that he is opposed to equal rights due to him being a Christian. Sorry, but I know hundreds of Christians who are not bigots like he is. Deal with it. That is just the man Barack, being who and what he is. As a man, it is not much, this rhetorical use of scriptures both he and his wife refuse to live by themselves. Show me Michelle living up to Paul's rules and regs for a month, then we can talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Well he's not against gay marriage---he double talks it though...
He considers gay marriage synonymous with civil marriage----that was a wholly political move because politicians have always used civil marriage in a way to mean something different from gay marriage. I agree that is annoying----what I do like is that he said he will be working to overturn DOMA and he's on his way to that. DADT is on hold, but it's on it's way out too---all that's left is two signatures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. So when he says marriage is between a man and a woman...
what does that mean to you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. He says 'I believe marriage is between one man and one
woman'. That is not double talk. It is clear. He says that is because of his Christianity although we all know that many Christians do not hold such bigotries, and in fact many gay people are Christians. What it is that you think he means when he says that stuff? Note that in Christian teachings 'double talk' is forbiden and known as 'lying'. This is a fact of the faith. Jesus forbids 'spin' or any form of speech that attempts to obscure the truth. So the 'double speak' is yet another example of hypocrisy, and it is no defense biblically speaking at all. And aside from that book, there is no argument at all.
Holding onto the idea that a Christian is not being truthful in order to promote his faith is sort of ironic. Hell, it is the definition of irony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. He's hypocritical on this issue. It makes little sense to be against marriage equality, like he is,
but then disagree with a state making sure its laws only allow for opposite sex marriage.

He can't be saying that while he is against same sex marriage, in the sense that he would not enter into one, he thinks others should be allowed to enter into such a marriage. He has never nuanced his remarks this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whyverne Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. Speaking of homophobia,
we were watching America's Got Talent last night. Prince Poppycock, who does one of the gayest acts that you can imagine, was voted through to the nest round by popular call-in vote.

I can't imagine that happening if America was mostly homophobic.

"America is always right", says judge Sharon Osbourne.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VMI Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. "one of the gayest acts that you can imagine"
can you elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. was going to ask the same thing
geez
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I love Prince Poppycock. Howie Mandell wondered if middle America would like him.
Well? He made it through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Me too, he is awesome
I know he will get a Vegas Show, regardless if he wins or loses.
He has so much talent, I just love his voice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uncommon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. I especially like the fact that this judge was first nominated by St. Reagan
then later by Bush1, LOL. I want to hear the hate radio crowd define this guy as a liberal nut now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
22. A lot of money -- from the Mormon Church and elsewhere --
went into the effort to pass Prop 8.

The Mormons claim to adhere to the tenets of the ministry of Jesus but it is very difficult to see where dumping a huge pile of cash into a proposition that when enacted would deny a significant percentage of citizens the right to marry whom they choose is anything close to the tenets the Church purports to follow.

I like the title of the piece here also: "Bigotry Takes a Hit..." Yes indeed.

Recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. The judge says the bigots have no rational basis for their view
And I agree, the bad faith based community is devoid of reason. Not at all pragmatic, an irrational and dogmatic line of bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC