Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REPORT: The GOP’s Agenda To Change The Constitution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:00 PM
Original message
REPORT: The GOP’s Agenda To Change The Constitution

REPORT: The GOP’s Agenda To Change The Constitution

Since President Obama took office, Republicans have shrouded their agenda of opposition by wrapping it in the flag and the Constitution. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) even went so far as to label her radical anti-government views “constitutional conservatism.” Yet, for all of their constitutional pablum, the GOP’s agenda is nothing less than a direct assault on America’s founding document. Time and time again, Republicans have called for basic constitutional freedoms and fundamental aspects of our constitutional government to be repealed either by amendment or by activist judges:

REPEALING CITIZENSHIP: Numerous GOP lawmakers, including their Senate leader and the most-recent Republican candidate for president, are lining up behind a “review” of the 14th Amendment’s grant of citizenship to virtually all persons born within the United States. Such a proposal literally revives the vision of citizenship articulated by the Supreme Court’s infamous pro-slavery decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford. It has no place in the twenty-first century.

REPEALING CONGRESS’ POWER TO REGULATE THE ECONOMY: The Constitution’s “Commerce Clause” gives national leaders broad authority to regulate the national economy, but much of the GOP has embraced “tentherism,” the belief that this power is small enough to be drowned in a bathtub. The most famous example of tentherism is the ubiquitous frivolous lawsuits claiming that health reform is unconstitutional, but these lawsuits are part of a much greater effort. In his brief challenging health reform, Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli claims that Congress is allowed to regulate “commerce on one hand” but not “manufacturing or agriculture.” Cuccinelli’s discredited vision of the Constitution was actually implemented in the late 19th and early 20th century, and it would strike down everything from child labor laws to the federal ban on whites-only lunch counters.

REPEALING CONGRESS’ POWER TO SPEND MONEY...

REPEALING CONGRESS’ POWER TO RAISE MONEY...

REPEALING EQUALITY...

REPEALING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS...

REPEALING ELECTION OF SENATORS...

more


GOP agenda:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. So much for the strict constitutionist meme... nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarge43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. That Constitution - it's a pesky thing. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Reason number 4081 to vote Democrat this November. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Have you noticed that GOP "amendments" restrict what the individual can do?
Edited on Thu Aug-05-10 12:46 PM by KansDem
No abortion

No same-sex marriage

No flag-burning

etc.etc.etc.

The Constitution should restrict what the state can do, not what the individual can do.

The Constitution is not a behavior-modification document...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Why are there so many 'amendments" to the constitution?
Precisely because the frames wanted change possible as conditions changed.
They made it very difficult however by requiring 2/3rds majority by states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC