bigdarryl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 03:31 PM
Original message |
GOP blocking two of Obama's nominees to the Federal bench because there to liberal |
|
Edited on Sat Aug-07-10 03:33 PM by bigdarryl
|
louis-t
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
davidinalameda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
I didn't want to be the grammar police
|
GSLevel9
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-08-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. yes but it stings your eyes when you read something like that. nt |
HCE SuiGeneris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-08-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
denimgirly
(929 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Too Liberal? LOL! At best there very similar to Obama: Center/Leaning Right. |
|
The two are definitely not liberals. They read more like center (with tendencies to lean right). Obama is clearly no progressive and my guess is he wanted someone similar to himself....mostly down the middle.
|
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. There's no their there. |
|
Sorry, but these threads get routed through an Internets tubular filter, which triggers an alarm to grammar nazis. :P
|
nightrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-08-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
12. they're their there.... to two too |
Better Believe It
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 03:42 PM
Response to Original message |
3. The Republicans will just for Democrats to filibuster (real ones) or they'll use the "nuclear option |
|
to impose their control over the Senate once they also control the White House.
They play hardball.
Most Democratic Senators throw their hands in the air and surrender to Republican demands.
And they call that governing!
|
Lil Missy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
6. "their too" liberal. "their" whining. |
ZM90
(56 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 10:21 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Just another example of the obstructionist G.O.B.P. |
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-08-10 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
14. The GOP = The Grumpy Obstructionist Party ;) n/t |
and-justice-for-all
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Well Scalia and Roberts are to fucking 'conservative'... |
|
which is equivalent to being fascist.
|
kiranon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-07-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Or maybe because the Republicans are also racists. n/t |
|
There won't be a minority left that will vote Republican after they insult everyone.
|
Tx4obama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Aug-08-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message |
13. There were a total of FIVE (not two) judicial nominees rejected/sent back to the WH Thursday |
|
Edited on Sun Aug-08-10 11:42 PM by Tx4obama
Liu, Chen, Chatigny, Butler, and McConnell Jr. http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8894078As far as the total number of 'blocked' judicial nominees with 'secret holds' on them the number is SEVERAL DOZEN.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message |