Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Think Progress: Gibbs needs drug testing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:28 PM
Original message
Think Progress: Gibbs needs drug testing
Edited on Tue Aug-10-10 04:03 PM by SpartanDem
I think Robert Gibbs needs to be drug tested if he thinks whining about liberal critics in an interview with The Hill is going to help him or Barack Obama in any way

Longtime readers and followers of various squabbles with FDL bloggers will know that I have some sympathy with the substance of what Gibbs has to say here. But you don’t improve your relationship with same-team ideological activists by attacking them in red-baiting terms. What’s more, we’re seeing a serious confusion here on the role of political activists in the system. As I said during the health care debate, it’s not the job of the President of the United States to stand up for a pure ideological vision—his job is to cut compromises to implement policies that improve on the status quo. But by the same token, it’s not the job of activists to be “satisfied” with compromises premised on the current boundaries of political feasibility.

I’m excited about the Affordable Care Act, but it’s completely true that I won’t be “satisfied” with American health care policy until it’s made much much better. What’s wrong with that? Being satisfied with the status quo never got anyone anywhere


http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/08/robert-gibbs-and-drug-testing


Can't say I disagree Gibbs was stupid to say that especially the way he said it. Today, we should be celebrating the thousands of teacher and other public workers jobs that were saved instead we're in the middle of another circular firing squad match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Think Progress gets it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hey Robert -- ya' ever piss in a teacup?
Because THOSE are the people you're supposed to be pissing off -- not your base, you idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gibbs is right, they don't have the resources to move further left and the people who mostly bitch
...about Obama aren't ones who are willing to get him those resources
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. What do you mean by "resources"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. $$$$$$$$$
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Do you really think it's all about money?.....Do you think he'd become FDR with just a few more $$$?
His "resources" are as good as any other Democratic president.

and where do you get your "facts" about the people who "mostly bitch" about Obama?

This "bitcher" gave him plenty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. His "resources" are as good as any other Democratic president.????
Compare Obama's House and Senate majorities to those of FDR, then get back to us.

Obama does not have the "resources" to overcome a DEDICATED minority resistance. Especially when you count the blue dogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Oh please....FDR's "resistance was so "dedicated" that they tried to overthrow him in a coup!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x3105116

As for the Blue Dogs...Hell, Obama goes out CAMPAIGNING for them!.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. If you want to prove me wrong, it shoud be easy.
Simply post the comparison ... FDR's congress, versus Obama's congress.

FDR had far more support than Obama does. And even FDR had to compromise some. Yet we expect more from Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. If you want to prove ME wrong, it should be even easier...
just click on the link and READ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. FAIL .... The tea party is winning when it comes to their ability to get out their message .........
and they're bankrupt, and I mean that figurative and literal sense. They;re morally bankrupt, and they owe tons of money with none on hand.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40800.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. ThinkProgress: Soon to join Tom Tomorrow under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-10-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Why would he be under the buses?
in fact he agrees that there is some truth do what Gibbs said he just argues that it's unproductive for Gibbs to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Please try re-reading my post. I said ThinkProgress, not Gibbs.
Best of luck. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Anyone who dares to criticize the whiners must be on drugs.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. I totally agree with Yglesias. Gibbs had some points but shouldn't have said it.
It is just pontentially destructive and now we have Grayson on tv saying Gibbs should be fired. We should be concentrating on the midterms, not this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. And the progressives need a pysc eval.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-11-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. I find it interesting that the DLC apologists are throwing everyone but BP and Goldman Sachs under
Edited on Wed Aug-11-10 11:22 PM by w4rma
the bus.

Pretty soon it will just be the DLC and the Tea Party in the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC