Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Targeting Murkowski, Tea Party Chooses Wisely

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:35 AM
Original message
In Targeting Murkowski, Tea Party Chooses Wisely
There’s no doubt that the Tea Party could get the Republicans in trouble in certain races. In Nevada and Kentucky, for example, Sharron Angle and Rand Paul knocked off candidates preferred by the party establishment in order to win their primaries. Although the FiveThirtyEight model has both Ms. Angle and Mr. Paul as slight favorites the general election, the races are closer than they otherwise might be.

With Senator Lisa Murkowski’s concession late Tuesday night in Alaska, where she was defeated by the insurgent candidate Joe Miller, the Tea Party will have played a role in defeating two Republican incumbents (Robert F. Bennett of Utah is the other). In these two cases, the Tea Party is on much firmer tactical ground.

...snip...

Under certain circumstances, these dalliances with centrism might be something Republicans might tolerate. It is unlikely that a senator significantly more conservative than Ms. Collins or Ms. Snowe could be elected out of Maine; instead, the seat would probably default to a Democrat. But Ms. Murkowski and Mr. Bennett hail from Alaska and Utah, two of the most conservative states in the country (although Alaska is somewhat idiosyncratically so), and Republicans could afford to be picky.

...snip...

Democrats, meanwhile, mounted serious primary challenges to three of their incumbents: Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas, and Michael Bennet of Utah (the challenge succeed only in Mr. Specter’s case). None of these quite fit the paradigm.


http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/in-targeting-murkowski-tea-party-chooses-wisely/#more-515
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Alaskan republicans are going to have to go through a reality check.
Edited on Wed Sep-01-10 09:47 AM by Arctic Dave
They may scream they are "by their bootstraps" type of success stories, but, in reality without the Federal Government, Alaska would still be a backwater state even with all of our resources.

Miller wants to take away the source of money that has made a lot of people a good living in this state. To appeal to the more moderate republicans joe will have to backpedal hard, which in turn will infuriate his rabid and irrational base.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can't believe that Angle is a "slight favorite" given all the things she has said...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-01-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I understand... but that ignores how deeply unpopular Reid had become.

Her foot-in-mouth disease has been the only thing keeping him in the race.

Don't tell her, but if she would just shut up and carry a placard reading "I'm not Harry"... she would win by double digits.

She has an ad going up in the next few days that aims to shift the debate back to how awful things have gotten in NV (and, of course, tying it all to Reid). We'll know in the next week or two whether she succeeds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC