Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Wisdom Of A Liberated Republican, Cont'd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-02-10 10:09 AM
Original message
The Wisdom Of A Liberated Republican, Cont'd
Oops!

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_09/025495.php

THE WISDOM OF A LIBERATED REPUBLICAN, CONT'D.... This week, congressional Republican leaders did their best to downplay the end of combat operations in Iraq, insisting President Obama was wrong and that President Bush deserves credit for recent progress. It was, even by GOP standards, a sad display.

Rep. Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) -- liberated in the wake of a primary defeat -- continues to embrace his new-found freedom. Yesterday, that meant blasting his party's leaders for politicizing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Inglis called criticism lobbed at President Obama by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) "offensive to me," and encouraged members of his party to "unite" behind the president. <...>

"What I'd say back to {Senate Minority Leader} Mitch McConnell and whoever is this is really not a time to play politics," Inglis told South Carolina's Spartanburg Herald-Journal. "It represents really the worst in politics, to politicize a war.
America's at war. And America's best are serving right now in some very dangerous places."


This is, oddly enough, similar to the message Republicans gave from 2003 to 2008, in response to Democratic criticism of Bush/Cheney. The rhetoric of the time was that wars are not campaign props to be exploited, and in a time of crisis, politicians shouldn't be trying to divide the country.

Inglis just happens to be saying it now under a Democratic administration.

Given how far he's strayed from his party lately, is there any chance the Democratic leadership may reach out to him for an 11th-hour party switch? Since Inglis is leaving Congress anyway, the practical implications would be minimal, but it could serve as an election-season reminder that the Republican Party may be moving too far in unhealthy directions.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC