Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'This Nation asks for action, and action now.'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:09 PM
Original message
'This Nation asks for action, and action now.'
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 11:15 PM by MannyGoldstein
From FDR's first inaugural address:

"This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly.

...

Recognition of the falsity of material wealth as the standard of success goes hand in hand with the abandonment of the false belief that public office and high political position are to be valued only by the standards of pride of place and personal profit; and there must be an end to a conduct in banking and in business which too often has given to a sacred trust the likeness of callous and selfish wrongdoing. Small wonder that confidence languishes, for it thrives only on honesty, on honor, on the sacredness of obligations, on faithful protection, on unselfish performance; without them it cannot live.

Restoration calls, however, not for changes in ethics alone. This Nation asks for action, and action now.

...

Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously. It can be accomplished in part by direct recruiting by the Government itself, treating the task as we would treat the emergency of a war, but at the same time, through this employment, accomplishing greatly needed projects to stimulate and reorganize the use of our natural resources."


http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5057/

And FDR went on to back up these words from his first inaugural with action. And for 60+ years working Americans prospered and Democrats held a more-or-less permanent majority in Congress.

http://www.meredith.edu/summer-reading/images/05,Eleanor%20and%20Franklin,.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
1.  Obama-FDR parallel should make Dems shiver in '10
http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/08/04/obama_fdr_2010


Wednesday, Aug 4, 2010 08:30 ET
Obama-FDR parallel should make Dems shiver in '10
Popular opinion is just as fickle in the Great Recession as it was in the Great Depression





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Suffice it to say
that my reading of history is quite different than that author's is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. K & R. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Those who try to compare Obama to FDR should bear this in mind:
below is what FDR had going for him when he first took office \in March 1933:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FDR
1932 election: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1932_election
1932 Electoral map: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/ElectoralCollege1932.svg

FDR's equivalent of "Blue Dogs" ("Southern Democrats") were "loyal" to him until 1937~1938, and a significant faction of the Republican Party supported him in Congress! Without all that, FDR would have been DEAD IN THE WATER!

The above was copied from another posting of mine that was in response to: "We need another FDR!", Cited with great approval, was a speech by FDR referring to the hatred of the economic royalists arrayed against him, He said: "And I welcome their hatred!" But not mentioned was that that speech was in 1936. By then, FDR had not only a LANDSLIDE victory under his belt, but a successful mid-term election in 1934.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Some other things FDR had going for him
He worked for working Americans, and he worked hard.

He used the bully pulpit.

He did not stock his administration almost exclusively with crypto-Republicans with long track records of screwing working Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. 'He used the bully pulpit.'
For all the reasons mentioned earlier, Obamas does NOT have a "bully pulpit", at least not one within a degree of magnitude of FDR's. In all likelihood, such a "bully pulpit" isn't even possible in these times. With no derogatory implications intended, the "common folk" of those times (my natal decade, sigh!) were LESS "sophisticated", and MORE "trusting" than today.

But depending on the outcome of the upcoming mid-term elections, Obama COULD have something approaching a "bully pulpit"! Give it a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. he used it in Campaign Mode-the bully pulpit & FDR convinced those 'blue
dogs' to come on over to his side-THAT is what great leaders DO, they even convince some of the other Party to join their cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. FDR & Obana
This is what FDR started with, after the 1932 elections:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/00/ElectoralCollege1932.svg

This is what Obama`started with after the 2008 elections:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ElectoralCollege2008.

Any further questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:10 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Oops! Screwed up links! Use these:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. FDR had two Republicans in his cabinet,
not to mention that many Democrats in that time were conservative Southerners. You no doubt would have been outraged at FDR for appointing a Wall Street industrialist like William Woodin as Treasurer Secretary. Things become less black and white when you learn the details of history.

"Almost exclusively with crypto-Republicans" is a gross exaggeration. There are a few high profile picks that are unpopular but that's no reason to hyperventilate with exaggeration. It's also insulting to good Democrats like Hilda Solis, Janet Napolitano, Susan Rice, Lisa Jackson and others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KakistocracyHater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. exactly, FDR got alot of people to side with him, as true leaders do
duh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. You want action, here's some action: More business tax cuts, comin' right up!!!
GLOPPPPP!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. I guess that's why our cluess nation is set to reward those who have blocked
progress and economic help at every turn. This country deserves what it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. FDR was very concerned about not running large deficits during his first term in office.
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 01:42 AM by Radical Activist
Personally, I think Obama is acting too much like FDR on this one, and should instead mimic the more Keynesian approach that FDR followed in later years. Do you agree that Obama should stop worrying so much about deficit spending just like FDR did during his first few years in office?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC