Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Newsweek cover highlights right-wing driven, often contradictory misinformation about Obama"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:23 AM
Original message
"Newsweek cover highlights right-wing driven, often contradictory misinformation about Obama"
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 12:34 AM by TomCADem
From media matters:

http://mediamatters.org/research/201009030023


The latest NEWSWEEK Poll tells a disturbing story. Obama's approval rating is 47 percent, slightly better than in the spring and not terrible for a president facing disturbing economic news. (Ronald Reagan touched bottom with 41 percent approval during the 1982-83 recession.) The problem is that some of the lies about Obama are gathering strength. In 2008, 13 percent of Americans were under the misimpression that he was a Muslim. Now the figure is 24 percent. One explanation may be that Obama's connection to his Chicago church was fresher in the public mind then. But the deeper problem is a growing number of people who think the president is not just disappointing or wrongheaded but dangerous. More than half of Republicans surveyed (52 percent) think it's "definitely true" or "probably true" that Obama "sympathizes with the goals of fundamentalists who want to impose Islamic law around the world." This says more about the mindset of the GOP than about Obama. It reflects not just the usual personal and partisan animus of the age (George W. Bush was subjected to exceptionally nasty attacks from the left) but a flight from facts--a startling disconnect between a quarter of the country and what some of Bush's aides once disparagingly called "the reality-based community."

The blame for this extends from Fox News and the Republican leadership, to the peculiar psychology of resentment in public opinion, to the ham-handed political response of the Obama White House. Whatever the cause, if smash-mouth tactics are validated by huge GOP gains in the midterm elections, then Big Lie politics may be with us for good.

In some ways, it has always been with us, going back to the 18th-century calumny of James Callender against John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton. More recently, the Rev. Jerry Falwell sponsored a film that falsely accused President Clinton of ordering murders and dealing drugs. What's changed about politics as a contact sport is the reach of the lies. With the exception of Father Charles Coughlin, the anti-Semitic "radio priest" of the 1930s, reactionaries haven't generally had big audiences. But now the cranks who once could do little more than write ranting letters to the editor on the red ribbons of their typewriters (loaded with exclamation points and in all caps, of course) can spread their venom virally, with the help of right-wing billionaires underwriting their organizations. And while the cable network they watch, Fox News, might not actively promote the idea that the president is a foreign-born Muslim, it does little to knock it down. Fox often covers Obama's place of birth and religion more as matters of opinion than of fact.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. The media does its job well, that's for sure.
Add that Democrats elected or otherwise don't feel a need to defend Obama from these smears,
like they defended Bill Clinton from the untrue rumors all the way to the blow job.

Guess Democrats liked Bill Clinton Better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. It's "Democrats" that are *MAKING* half of those smears
Well, two out of the six: "Warmongering" and "Wall Street-Loving"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brandlon Donating Member (96 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't care what
point Newsweek was trying to make. I think the cover is distasteful even with asterisk.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supply Side Jesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. A President who gets a cover like that -- even with the asterisk --
Edited on Sun Sep-05-10 03:25 AM by smalll
and "make no mistake" -- the righties will go into conniption fits over this, and see it as yet another proof of "liberal media bias" ---

but at the same time, a President who gets a cover like that clearly has less than competent advisers, optics-wise. Look, I like David Axelrod, but honestly,

Ou sont les Michael Deavers d'antan? (For a random Proust reference.)

Deaver would never let any President under his charge (for example) be photographed in mandals time and time again. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Or perhaps it just reflects a dumbed down media?
And mandals? I mean, that is what you have an issue with? How incredibly sexist and self-serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. So Newsweek is saying he is NOT our President
... Godless Muslim President *
* who isn't actually any of these things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Funny that half of the lies on the cover are from the left
The other half are from the right. Mediamatters mentions Fox News but not MSNBC. Hmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. hell the cover doesn't help. who's going to see the little blip at
the bottom that he isn't any of those things as they walk by the newstand on the way to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denimgirly Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. Except for Wall Street Lover, The cover was correct in pointing out the lies by the right
but still obama is in love with helping special interests and wall street..that is definitely true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. And "warmonger" NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Haha...
You've just perfectly illustrated the very point of the cover.

"Wall Street Lover"... :scared: Oooga Friggin' Booga...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Wall St. has turned on Obama because HE has turned on THEM. And I have a link to back
this up: "Why Wall St. Is Deserting Obama" http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/31/business/31sorkin.html?_r=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC